On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:03 AM Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Before going to vote it would need to demonstrate some sort of clear
> benefit and
> consensus that it is reasonable.
>
For this, as well as my take on this
Even better stated, if pangoSE is interested in a longer-term goal (and, it
truly must be this if anything at all) of moving OSM towards becoming a "full
member of the semantic web," fairly large things must happen.
1) Linked data and "the semantic web" (which has been emerging since circa
I didn't mean to convey or imply that a vote was impending, moreso that I
seriously disagree with the proposal as unneeded, unnecessary, poorly explained
as to its benefits, and (as was well described before, though I paraphrase), "a
ready-made answer for a non-problem." My apologies if
Aug 10, 2020, 07:49 by md...@xs4all.nl:
> On 2020-08-10 03:32, stevea wrote:
>
>> On Aug 9, 2020, at 5:29 AM, pangoSE wrote:
>>
>>> The discussion below spawned the following idea of migrating the whole tags
>>> system instead.
>>>
>> (an over engineered proposal largely, as Frederick says
On 2020-08-10 03:32, stevea wrote:
On Aug 9, 2020, at 5:29 AM, pangoSE wrote:
The discussion below spawned the following idea of migrating the whole
tags system instead.
(an over engineered proposal largely, as Frederick says and I agree
with, goosed by the "hype of linked data.")
I politely
5 matches
Mail list logo
