Re: [Talk-at] Peter Paul

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:23:01 +0100 Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > On 21.12.2016 18:07, Stefan Kopetzky wrote: > > "Kahlengebirge", hab ich so auch noch nie gehört... > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gipfel_des_Kahlengebirges.jpg Das Bild ist auch von einem User upgeloadet

[talk-au] When is a road not a road

In this case I know the roads, I have walked, ridden a bike, and in some cases driven them. They exist, but they are in a restricted area. This is possibly why they do not appear on the WAMR data. I guess my question includes the concept of what roads should appear on the OSM map. I know

Re: [talk-au] When is a road, not a road?

I've found that there are quite a few MRWA road centre-lines that bear no relation to where the actual road is. Usually because there are big lumps of granite in the way, or quarries, or other physical reasons to re-route the road. (I guess the road-builders don't tell MRWA that they changed

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Ha Noj Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 21. 12. 2016 21:11:44 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení? " > > > Pro korekci tohoto posunu se dá použít korekční Grid ( http://freegis.

Re: [talk-au] When is a road, not a road?

The metadata says that it includes roads maintained by Main Roads and "all roads controlled by Local Government (Local Roads) that are assigned road numbers", which is great. It also has "other centreline is also included for paths and unknown roads" which is a bit vague as to how complete the

Re: [talk-au] When is a road, not a road?

On 22-Dec-16 03:59 PM, Warren wrote: I suspect the answer to this question is simple. Following Sam Wilson's post about the data sources available for Western Australian Roads, and using Sam's approach I have begun adding and checking road names in WA. In the area that I am currently

[talk-au] When is a road, not a road?

I suspect the answer to this question is simple. Following Sam Wilson's post about the data sources available for Western Australian Roads, and using Sam's approach I have begun adding and checking road names in WA. In the area that I am currently working there are a number of named

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rendu FR, bientôt en version 2017 !

Le 22 décembre 2016 à 01:05, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : > on parle beaucoup des transport public en ce moment, ça serait bien que > les arrets de bus, tram metro ... soit rendu qu'avec des tag > public_transport= et aussi si ce n'est pas un node mais un way ou >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rendu FR, bientôt en version 2017 !

Le 21 décembre 2016 à 23:56, a écrit : > Niveau 10 > > : > > les zones militaires et zones protégées me semblent trop mises en avant. > La zone en elle même n'a pas changé, il

Re: [OSM-talk] Building Detection using Machine Learning

Hi, On 12/22/2016 01:10 AM, john whelan wrote: > Do we have any guidelines in the wiki etc? Nothing specific, no. Automated editing and/or import guidelines would apply to any such process and I would ask everyone who overhears discussions about "uploading" machine-detected data to OSM to point

[OSM-talk] Building Detection using Machine Learning

Do we have any guidelines in the wiki etc? I'm not intending doing any but the topic has come up once or twice and has currently been raised in the HOT mailing list. I'm almost certain that as the accuracy improves so the topic will come up again and we should at least have some guidelines in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rendu FR, bientôt en version 2017 !

on parle beaucoup des transport public en ce moment, ça serait bien que les arrets de bus, tram metro ... soit rendu qu'avec des tag public_transport= et aussi si ce n'est pas un node mais un way ou multipolygon. Le 21 décembre 2016 à 23:56, a écrit : > Niveau

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] fiber=yes ?

Bonjour Jean-Yvon, Le 18 décembre 2016 à 20:49, a écrit : > Je vais te proposer de mettre fin à ton dilemme : > telecom:medium:fiber=yes > telecom:medium:coax=yes > > Pas de soucis pour les armoires à usage multiple. > Et comme il y a trois et non deux cas

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rendu FR, bientôt en version 2017 !

Niveau 10 : les zones militaires et zones protégées me semblent trop mises en avant. Niveau 11 : et sans doute ailleurs

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nouvelles bornes Trilib'

> name =Trilib' Fin du monologue ;-). Tu veux sans doute dire brand=Trilib' car ce n'est pas la borne qui s'appelle comme ça. Jean-Yvon Le

Re: [Talk-pe] rutas en Peru

Hola de nuevo, me tarde un poco porque me puse a revisar los casos de las vías que mencionabas. On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:24:37 -0500, joost schouppe wrote: > Sobre highway=road: entiendo muy bien que uno prefiere mapear en categoria > general, mas bien que categoria

Re: [talk-au] Local Government Areas without Councils

On 21-Dec-16 05:10 PM, Warin wrote: Hummm How about looking at it from a data consumers view point? Who would use boundary level 6 and what for? A resident/occupier/potential purchaser/developer may want to know who is the relevant authority for a particular property ... A new employee many

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] intégration des référentiels STIF

h Le 16/12/2016 à 17:36, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : Le 16 décembre 2016 à 13:01, lenny.libre > a écrit : Ne faudrait-il pas quelque part, une récapitulation Un genre de Base d'Arrêts de Transport Ouverte ? ^^ Contributions bienvenues

Re: [Talk-at] Peter Paul

On 21.12.2016 17:32, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > Wegen so einer Kleinigkeit scheint es mir übertrieben, die DWG zu > bemühen, und ich habe mich mit dem Teil Wiens nicht genug beschäftigt um > den Namen dieses Berges beurteilen zu können. Falls es sich wirklich als Problem herausstellen sollte,

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

> > > Pro korekci tohoto posunu se dá použít korekční Grid ( http://freegis.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/S-JTSK_/_Grid ), který ovšem > > po změně algoritmu nedává správná data, takže přepočet není správný. > > *** nic takového se neprokázalo. ;) > > > Fááákt? A proč mám sakra tady v Beskydech ty rozdíly :-D

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] cartes.xyz / bad request

Pas mieux, merci Éric pour la réponse. Je profite de ce fil de discussion sur MapContrib pour vous dire que la version 1.0.0 pourrait arriver par la cheminée ce week-end, mais chut ^^ Bon réveillon à tous, Guillaume Le 21/12/2016 à 20:39, Éric Gillet a écrit : Le 21 décembre 2016 à

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] cartes.xyz / bad request

Le 21 décembre 2016 à 19:53, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : > Désolé de relancer le sujet mais j'ai créé une nouvelle carte des bornes > Trilib' à Paris https://www.cartes.xyz/t/fcd984-Bornes_Trilib > Cette fois j'ai bien retenu la leçon et je n'ai pas mis de requête >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] cartes.xyz / bad request

Désolé de relancer le sujet mais j'ai créé une nouvelle carte des bornes Trilib' à Paris https://www.cartes.xyz/t/fcd984-Bornes_Trilib Cette fois j'ai bien retenu la leçon et je n'ai pas mis de requête overpass-turbo mais bien une requête API overpass. J'ai toujours le même soucis : bad request

[OSM-talk-fr] Rendu FR, bientôt en version 2017 !

Je profite des congés pour avancer sur le rendu FR... La liste des commit s'allonge et donne une idée des changements: https://github.com/cquest/osmfr-cartocss/commits/master Après avoir passé pas mal de temps sur les optimisations pour accélrer le rendu là où c'était le plus urgent, je suis de

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Fwd: [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Great new. The local OSM mappers are looking forward to adding this data set. John Marshall On Dec 21, 2016 09:41, "James" wrote: > Just to give an update, Ottawa has finally approved moving the building > outlines to the open data portal. The person responsible is on

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nouvelles bornes Trilib'

Je crois que je prends le sujet beaucoup trop au sérieux, j'ai même fait une page wiki sur le sujet : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/FR:Trilib Le 19 décembre 2016 à 12:41, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : > Bon ben on a une réponse : ça sera dispo bientôt ;) >

Re: [Talk-at] Peter Paul

On 21.12.2016 18:07, Stefan Kopetzky wrote: Ich bin dort in der Nähe aufgewachsen und wohn auch immer noch im NW von Wien. Die Bezeichnung taucht mW irgendwann in den letzten 10 Jahren auf. Davor hätt ichs nie gehört. was aber auch an mir liegen kann. Dafür ist es halt jetzt schon ziemlich weit

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Un peu d'explication: Rennes Métropole différencie en fait la notion d'adresse et de bâtiment aussi pour une raison réglementaire très simple: - les numéros d'adresses (y compris bis/ter) sont attribué officiellement par le maire de la commune - les autres extensions (A/B/C/D pour différencier des

Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

I really don't have to justify how we in Nottingham have chosen to tag things, or what we map. This has evolved as a local consensus and works fine for us. However, we have found retaining older information invaluable for numerous purposes related to maintaining up-to-date data within OSM. In

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

Dne 21.12.2016 v 16:16 Ha Noj napsal(a): > 0 > Teoreticky bych se u každé budovy mohl zeptat WFS a korigované > souřadnice, ale je to zase další dotaz do sítě, další zdržení během > trasování. > *** tak se zeptejme WFS předem hromadně přes BBOX či podobně. > Tak jestli se budu někdy nudit, tak

Re: [Talk-at] Peter Paul

On 2016-12-21 17:32, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > In Wien benennt ein User regelmäßig einen Berg anscheinend nach sich > selber, unbeeindruckt davon, dass der Name jedes Mal wieder gelöscht > wird. Meine PN scheint er nicht wahrgenommen zu haben. > >

[Talk-at] Peter Paul

In Wien benennt ein User regelmäßig einen Berg anscheinend nach sich selber, unbeeindruckt davon, dass der Name jedes Mal wieder gelöscht wird. Meine PN scheint er nicht wahrgenommen zu haben. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/peterpp/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/510342 Wegen so

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > There's also garmin.openstreetmap.nl where you can define your own custom > bounding box for generating Garmin routable map files. Perhaps that helps. Lately several people reported errors with this service. You

Re: [Talk-de] Import Gehwegdaten Heidelberg

Hallo, vielen Dank schonmal für die genaue Prüfung! On 17.12.2016 20:58, Joachim Kast wrote: "source:sidewalk_attributes" wurde fälschlicherweise auch an alle Knoten der bearbeiteten Straßen gehängt. Stimmt, das ist falsch und wird korrigiert. "paved" ist als Oberflächenbeschaffenheit

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Bon, ça ne m'avance pas tellement tout ça... Si je comprends bien, il n'y a pas de consensus concernant l'espace ou non. Concernant l'import depuis les données de Rennes Métropole, il faudrait le corriger pour qu'il inclue aussi les lettres (A, B, ...) des bâtiments. Dans l'immédiat, est-il

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17

Hi Dan, Not sure if Dave actually reads this list any more -- these messages are posted automatically as far as I know. There's also garmin.openstreetmap.nl where you can define your own custom bounding box for generating Garmin routable map files. Perhaps that helps. Martijn On

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17

Dave, Please include enough of the Yukon Territory so as to allow for routing between Alaska and the Lower 48. As it is now, the Alaska Highway is cut off above Whitehorse. Cheers, Dan Townsley > On 2016Dec21, at 04:00, talk-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > [Talk-us] Whole-US

Re: [Talk-it] OSM e CAI

Il 20/12/2016 09:12, Luca Delucchi ha scritto: > pià che togliere il link sarebbe da modificare il preset e aggiungere > un rimando alla pagine del CAI, mettendo un po' a posto il testo.. > Ho capito, il fine settimana, se mi ricordo, vedo di metterci mano. -- Simone Girardelli

Re: [Talk-cz] RUIAN posun - konečné řešení?

0 > Teoreticky bych se u každé budovy mohl zeptat WFS a korigované souřadnice, ale je to zase další dotaz do sítě, další zdržení během trasování. *** tak se zeptejme WFS předem hromadně přes BBOX či podobně. > Pro korekci tohoto posunu se dá použít korekční Grid (

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Bien sûr des contre exemples il y aura à la pelle..j'énonçais seulement des généralités et on aura aussi les 10-1 , 10-2 , 10-3 , 10-4 à la place de ce que voulez.Ce qui est sûr c'est que c'est de la numérotation dans tous les cas, ce qui plaide pour le mettre tout ce qui est numérotation avec

Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

Hi Andrew I wouldn't use FHRS:ID as the be all & end all. It doesn't mean they've closed down. On the ground verification is required. Depending on a local authority's preferences, existing companies changing a name, or a manager can trigger a new ID. Schools becoming academies in my area

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Fwd: [Import] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

Just to give an update, Ottawa has finally approved moving the building outlines to the open data portal. The person responsible is on vacation and will be back the 9th of January 2017 and expect it to be live by the end of that week. So with data source not being publicly available, are there

Re: [Talk-cl] Geoprints

Hola Juan Carlos, Claramente es un plagio (múltiples geometrías, categorización de tramos, etc.), aunque se ve que es un render personalizado a pesar de los colores, pues algunos nombres están abreviados y otros borrados. Claramente las personas mencionadas cobraron, pagándose con fondos del

Re: [Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016

+1   Originalnachricht   Von: dktue Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 14:29 An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org Antwort an: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016 +1 Am 21.12.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Wochennotizteam: Hallo, die

Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

I am more interested in the possibility that the business has closed. -- Andrew From: SK53 Sent: 21 December 2016 13:17:48 To: Andrew Hain Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS? Technically

Re: [Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016

+1 Am 21.12.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Wochennotizteam: Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 335 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2016/12/wochennotiz-nr-335/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données du STIF sur Osmose

Le 20/12/2016 à 02:35, Jérôme Amagat a écrit : peut être baisser le paramètre conflationDistance, là pour les bus elle est à 100 (mètres?) la baisser à 10 voir à 5 mètres comme ça moins de proposition d'intégration mais on est (pratiquement) sur que c'est le même arrêt dans osm et dans la

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osmose et adresses bis

Hello, Le 20/12/2016 à 20:44, Mathias Jérôme a écrit : > Les bis, ter etc... sont des indices de répétitions, mais les A,B,C etc... > sont plutôt ce que j'appellerais des indices de déclinaisons (dans le cas du > 36bis c'est que le 36 existe (ou existait) et est (était) vraiment distinct,

Re: [Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

Technically these are still FHRS identifiers as old identifiers are not reused. Obviously in the case where a new business in the same premises gets an FHRS identifier then that should take precedence. We have quite a few in Nottingham, older ones are shunted into old_fhrs:id (pretty much our

[Talk-GB] Notes for places removed from FHRS?

Richmond has updated its FHRS records and two entries that previously appeared in the list are now reported as unresolved in the GregRS tool. Should I add notes that they are no longer in FHRS and should be checked in the ground or is adding notes from public quality assurance tools a bad

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

A PROW is "theoretical" in the sense that it may not follow the exact same course on the ground. But the fact that a hedge or whatever is blocking a PROW does not create a legal diversion of the PROW - you are not automatically entitled to leave the PROW in order to continue your walk. So the line

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/16 12:25, Dave F wrote: All: Are we greed that if it's *definitely* been issued under OGL, a local authority's data can be used within OSM? See An OGL may require specific attribution, in which case that

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Yeah, sorry about that ;-) All: Are we greed that if it's *definitely* been issued under OGL, a local authority's data can be used within OSM? And by 'used' I don't necessarily mean copied directly. I'm overlaying my LA's PROW data to see what's missing so I can walk & survey it detail.

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

A few quick notes, some of this has been said before: - The license issue is complex, largely because there is no adequate audit trail of metadata associated with the data. As Phil says many definitive maps were compiled by parish councillors, but this would have been in the 1940s

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Thanks to all who linked to the specific ERoY page. I had already read it, which is why I asked Chris H which license he believed was used. In this case it doesn't appear clear cut, which is disappointing. DaveF On 21/12/2016 11:50, Andy Townsend wrote: On 21/12/2016 11:32, Dave F wrote:

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Let me know when the Council takes action against rowmaps. Until then it's just two conflicting accounts, neither of which is independently verifiable. Barry can speak for himself of course, but I can't see that he owes you an explanation. Owen @owenboswarva On 21 December 2016 at 11:53, Chris

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Owen, I’ve seen that before, but it is at odds with my experience. I have asked ERoY council to release their Rights of Way data under OGL repeatedly. I have asked by email, through their customer services web page, by twitter, by letter, by telephone, by asking my local councillors to help and

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/2016 11:32, Dave F wrote: Interesting. Under what license to you believe East Riding issued the data that ROWmaps is using? The actual page at the rowmaps site is: http://www.rowmaps.com/datasets/EY/ It seems to say (and I'm paraphrasing) "ERYC say it's Crown Copyright, but the OS

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données du STIF sur Osmose

En revanche les données fournies par l'Open Data de la STAR à Rennes sont excellentes (en terme de géolocalisation et complétude)... sauf qu'Osmose insiste pour changer les tags de numéros de référence et ne produit actuellement presque uniquement 100% de faux positifs sur tous les arrêts (pour

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/16 11:32, Dave F wrote: Interesting. Under what license to you believe East Riding issued the data that ROWmaps is using? Assuming it was taken from: for which the copyright details are on

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

http://www.rowmaps.com/datasets/EY/ contains the following text: "The council of East Riding of Yorkshire have provided me with an ESRI shape file [1] that contains the details of their public rights of way. The ESRI shape file seems to have been created on 27th February 2014. The Council also

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

When I asked the council they said they had no record of releasing the data under any licence. The data is published on a copyright map on the ERoY web site and the council always pointed me to that. The data is available to be extracted from that site, but obviously I can’t use that as it is

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

The circumstances under which the East Riding of Yorkshire data was provided to rowmaps are set out here: http://www.rowmaps.com/datasets/EY/ I've no reason to mistrust Barry's account. But there is obviously a provenance issue for other users if the Council as copyright holder has not confirmed

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Interesting. Under what license to you believe East Riding issued the data that ROWmaps is using? DaveF. On 21/12/2016 11:17, Chris Hill wrote: Row maps is definitely not based on OGL data. It includes E Yorks and Hull data that both councils have explicitly refused to release as OGL. I

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/16 11:10, Dave F wrote: It is also unlikely that anyone providing physical access to the map will know the copyright status. Could you expand on your claims please. Whilst it appears that more than I thought publish online, even if the jury is out on licensing, those that don't

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Thanks everyone for the rapid influx of comments. I've clearly mined a deep vein here. In my locale, the council's records are overlays onto OS mapping, so this is what I'm taking away from the conversation: You should not copy from these maps, but they are useful to get an idea > of what is

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 11:07 +, Chris Hill wrote: > Have any Local Authorities released their definitive maps or > statements under OGL? I want to know so I can use examples as a lever > to persuade East Riding of Yorkshire and Hull City councils to > release *anything* as open data.  > The

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

I believe that link to be unsupported by contradicting evidence. Chris Hill (User chillly) > On 21 Dec 2016, at 11:15, Dave F wrote: > > Hi > I'm a bit confused. Both Chris & David W. appear to have missed the link to > http://www.rowmaps.com/

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Row maps is definitely not based on OGL data. It includes E Yorks and Hull data that both councils have explicitly refused to release as OGL. I have asked Barry for his sources and there has been a stoney silence. If anyone has used rowmaps as a source for OSM edits I would revert that edit.

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Hi I'm a bit confused. Both Chris & David W. appear to have missed the link to http://www.rowmaps.com/. Can others see it? DaveF. On 21/12/2016 11:07, Chris Hill wrote: Have any Local Authorities released their definitive maps or statements under OGL? I want to know so I can use examples as

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/2016 11:04, David Woolley wrote: A more complete answer is "probably not", as it is unlikely that many definitive maps are provided under such a licence. If they are, they will almost certainly be online. It is also unlikely that anyone providing physical access to the map will

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On 21/12/16 10:54, Dave F wrote: Short answer: Yes, it can be incorporated as long as it's been issued under the Open Government Licence. http://www.rowmaps.com/ A more complete answer is "probably not", as it is unlikely that many definitive maps are provided under such a licence. If they

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 10:39 +, Paul Berry wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As you probably know, local authorities must keep available an up-to- > date copy of rights of way for inspection. Can this information then > be incorporated into OSM, having been witnessed, or is it a case of > public but

Re: [Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Hi Paul Short answer: Yes, it can be incorporated as long as it's been issued under the Open Government Licence. http://www.rowmaps.com/ However, this data is not always the most accurate & the consensus is that it's much better if "witnessed" by walking it. For example, the direction of a

[Talk-GB] Local Authority rights of way information

Hi everyone, As you probably know, local authorities must keep available an up-to-date copy of rights of way for inspection. Can this information then be incorporated into OSM, having been witnessed, or is it a case of public but copyrighted? I'm currently nursing a complaint about a rural right

Re: [Talk-it] OSMit2017 a Genova 8-11 febbraio in FOSS4G

Ciao Alessandro, ne approfitto per segnalare in lista questa iniziativa che abbiamo appena lanciato e di cui Wikimedia Italia è partner. Credo che possa essere nelle "corde" di molte delle persona iscritte a questa lista e

[Talk-it] OSMit2017 a Genova 8-11 febbraio in FOSS4G

Buongiorno, desidero comunicare a tutta la comunità OpenStreetMap che OSMit2017 avrà luogo dall'8 all'11 febbraio a Genova, ospitata dall'Università di Genova a Villa Giustiniani Cambiaso http://osm.org/go/xX0mu8kRd--?m= nella stessa sede che vide svolgersi OSMit2010 OSMit2017 si terrà

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données du STIF sur Osmose

Le 21/12/2016 à 09:58, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : Merci Fred, Noémie pour ces outils. Je rejoins les critiques : c'est pour l'instant un peu galère voir trompeur. Je comprends néanmoins qu'on ne puisse faire mieux pour l'instant ... En ce moment j'aborde le problème de qualité avec divers

Re: [Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016

+1 > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Wochennotizteam [mailto:wnrea...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 10:29 > An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org > Betreff: Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016 > > Hallo, > > die Wochennotiz Nr. 335 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten

Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 335 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2016/12/wochennotiz-nr-335/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Wochennotiz Nr. 335 13.12.2016–19.12.2016

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 335 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2016/12/wochennotiz-nr-335/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Données du STIF sur Osmose

Merci Fred, Noémie pour ces outils. Je rejoins les critiques : c'est pour l'instant un peu galère voir trompeur. Je comprends néanmoins qu'on ne puisse faire mieux pour l'instant ... En ce moment j'aborde le problème de qualité avec divers acteurs du transport et j'ai fait un petit comparatif

Re: [Talk-GB] 3rd Midlands OSM New Year Meetup

I'll do my best to get along. These paths have not only been well surveyed over past 7 years, but they are short. I can probably describe each of these routes across the railway to a very fine level of detail. For instance there is a fine hedge of Holly along the east side of the path north of