--- On Sat, 13/12/08, Darrin Smith wrote:
> I'm totally on your wavelength with respect to the making our usage
> match the worlds usage, and making a new tag when we have something
> different, and I get the impression a couple of others on here have
> similar opinions in a general sense.
>
> Ho
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:22:05 -0800 (PST)
bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > So after realising this I can't actually stand in support of
> > junction=roundabout on a point (or some other similar proposal) as a
> > permanent fixture, but would fully support it as a 'temporary' tag
> > to indicate
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:08:54 +1100
Ian Sergeant wrote:
> + When you cross this kind of roundabout when cycling, or with a
> learner driver, you don't have to worry about the characteristics of
> the road you are crossing (since you never turn into the traffic of
> the cross road, you just cross t
bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I thought the same when I first started mapping, as I wanted to show
> centre & pedestrian islands like in the Melways. But the wiki is very
> specific http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
> It says that normal pedestrian islands aren't
Sean <4ey0ll...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> I never said I was mapping for a particular program or device. Garmin
> was just an example. I'm mapping for all programs and devices. As all
> programs or devices can render a loop way it just makes more since to
> do it that way.
I don't know of an
5 matches
Mail list logo
