Sean <4ey0ll...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> program or device will still display the way as a roundabout that the
> user will still understand what it is even if the roundabout tag is removed.
The user may understand, but the device won't if there are no tags.
However I see below that I've been mis
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Matt White wrote:
> How are people mapping National Park (or state forest or other
> government mandated areas)? It seems that in a lot of cases, there is no
> way of actually doing an on the ground survey - a lot of the boundaries
> aren't marked, the areas can be massively in
Sam Couter sam-at-couter.id.au |OSM list| wrote:
> Sean <4ey0ll...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I never said I was mapping for a particular program or device. Garmin
>> was just an example. I'm mapping for all programs and devices. As all
>> programs or devices can render a loop way it just
b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
> As it stands this hasn't really been addressed. Generally I just mark
> what's on the ground, ie the natural=wood boundary as this tends to
> give a reasonable indication of the national park boundary anyway.
> Obviously this has limits, but unless some government
As it stands this hasn't really been addressed. Generally I just mark what's on
the ground, ie the natural=wood boundary as this tends to give a reasonable
indication of the national park boundary anyway. Obviously this has limits, but
unless some government authority grants us use of their maps
How are people mapping National Park (or state forest or other
government mandated areas)? It seems that in a lot of cases, there is no
way of actually doing an on the ground survey - a lot of the boundaries
aren't marked, the areas can be massively inaccessible etc.
Add to that things like mar
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Sam Couter wrote:
> > A straight line between two places is better than no line.
>
> A straight line is at least topographically correct, which for road
> navigation is incredibly useful.
> --
*If* the ways are actually connected.
While this list recently looked at Geelong and
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Ian Sergeant wrote:
> (Although I think
> people arguing against overloading tags have a bigger campaign on their
> hands than just mini-roundabouts.)
The highway reference tag has two things in the one tag - the highway type
and the highway number.
Then the double naming o
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Ian Sergeant wrote:
> The primary questions here is:
>
>
>
> My position is a node for three reasons..
or something like a josm plugin which would turn a node into a little way with
4 nodes, on demand?
>
> + When you cross this kind of roundabout when cycling, or with a lear
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Darrin Smith wrote:
> Here's a pic of one of those near-mini's I spotted in Gascoyne Avenue,
> Hillcrest, I think they to fulfill every criteria of Liz's defintion
> except for the different signage (in the first pic you can see the
> bottom of the standard sign there).
>
> htt
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
> It says that normal pedestrian islands aren't meant to be drawn as two
> separate ways (flares). I
the pedestrian islands are *splitter islands*
just being pedantic
the flare is used to describe the flared direction of the incoming traffic
w
11 matches
Mail list logo
