On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> doing things, that's all. I started out when the only Potlatch
> editing mode was live editing - and I'm used to doing things, checking
> them, and then pushing save if I'm happy. This made me immediately
> look for something that worked that
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> don't know what is avail in potlatch overall
> a is 'add' mode
> s is 'select' mode
> d is 'delete' mode
> u is unselect
>
Oh yeah, good old modal editing :) It's like using vim. I found this
horribly tedious. In potlatch, left-click does e
>
> >JOSM can be used offline,
So far all that's done for me is lose a chunk of edits when they conflicted
at upload time. :( (I don't really "do" offline anymore...)
> you can use it to import data.
Do you do that much? Where do you get it from?
>Less responsive. Using an applet in a browser
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, you wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Liz wrote:
> > JOSM and Potlatch are not a feature choice, but
> > how_you_like_to_use_your_computer choice.
> >
> > As a keyboard user who started in the 60s (it was a typewriter then) the
> > keyboard shortcuts in JOSM are my favo
2009/12/8 Roy Wallace :
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious to hear what you
>> don't like about Potlatch.
>
> Less responsive. Using an applet in a browser is slower (in my
> experience). I also find the panels of JOSM very useful (Relations,
> Properties, La
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> I'm curious to hear what you
> don't like about Potlatch.
Less responsive. Using an applet in a browser is slower (in my
experience). I also find the panels of JOSM very useful (Relations,
Properties, Layers, etc.).
__
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Liz wrote:
> JOSM and Potlatch are not a feature choice, but
> how_you_like_to_use_your_computer choice.
>
> As a keyboard user who started in the 60s (it was a typewriter then) the
> keyboard shortcuts in JOSM are my favourite feature.
>
>
Sure, I'm a big keyboar
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> > I tried using Potlatch, but I've not used it before, and it's driving
> > me mad. I'm tempted to try Merkaartor, but I'm used to JOSM, I'd
> > rather get it working if I could. I tried the WMS met
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> I'm looking to use Nearmap with JOSM. I was doing so quite happily
> with the old instructions (using the tested version from bigtincan as
> listed in the Nearmap page on the Wiki) but I made the mistake of
> upgrading JOSM, as it told me min
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> I tried using Potlatch, but I've not used it before, and it's driving
> me mad. I'm tempted to try Merkaartor, but I'm used to JOSM, I'd
> rather get it working if I could. I tried the WMS method listed in
> the wiki page, But all it downlo
I'm looking to use Nearmap with JOSM. I was doing so quite happily
with the old instructions (using the tested version from bigtincan as
listed in the Nearmap page on the Wiki) but I made the mistake of
upgrading JOSM, as it told me mine was out of date. Now I can't seem
to get any version of Sli
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 2009/12/8
Subject: Re: [Aust-NZ] Anyone able to get/offer proper legal advice over ODBL?
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org, John Smith
Hi John,
Not legal advice, but some comments/concerns based on what I know of
it that might help. I'm pretty sur
Quoting John Smith :
> 2009/12/5 Brendan Morley :
> > Interesting, this view shows a latest imagery date of 21 November for me...
> yet no tweet ...
> >
> > http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.671647,152.89602&z=19&t=k
>
> Same thing with the last Sydney imagery...
The tweet went out yesterday...
The
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I came across this today*, if it is of any interest:
>
> http://www.ands.org.au/guides/cc-and-data.html
>
> Steve
> * At work. Legitimately work related!
well it is of interest
the whole collection is protected under the Australian version (in Australia I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Nick Hocking wrote:
> I'll be driving from Canberra to Adelaide on December 22nd.
>
> Normally I would turn left at Balranald but I coulf just go straight ahead
> and maybe survey Paringa and stay overnight at Renmark.
still a few villages to do on the southern road
but Peter ha
I'll be driving from Canberra to Adelaide on December 22nd.
Normally I would turn left at Balranald but I coulf just go straight ahead
and maybe survey Paringa and stay overnight at Renmark.
On the way out (Jan 3) I could do a little bit more... I was contemplating
Manangatang but someone seems
I came across this today*, if it is of any interest:
http://www.ands.org.au/guides/cc-and-data.html
Steve
* At work. Legitimately work related!
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 07/12/2009, at 7:29 PM, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/12/7 Liz :
>> James has been pointing out that the Feds, who can afford good lawyers, find
>> CC-by-Sa and CC-by as quite satisfactory in Australia.
>
> As far as I can gather CC-BY-SA most likely won't work in the US, so I
> can only guess that
2009/12/7 Liz :
> and we are not in a position to agree to a change without am opinion by a
> lawyer on our lawyer, not a licence working group member's opinion on our law.
I agree, but I don't have any legal resources at my disposal, although
the OSGeo guys might.
> James has been pointing out t
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Liz wrote:
> and we are not in a position to agree to a change without am opinion by a
> lawyer on our lawyer, not a licence working group member's opinion on our
> law.
>
> James has been pointing out that the Feds, who can afford good lawyers,
> find CC-by-Sa and CC-by as quit
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
> So to me, the devil is in the details and I think we need to try and
> get our own legal advice on how it will effect us in Australia because
> so far they have had 5 legal opinions, but only for the UK and the US.
and we are not in a position to agree to a
21 matches
Mail list logo
