2009/12/11 Chris Barham :
> Hi,
> I think I have found a good datasource for OSM, but I've run out of
> steam trying to manipulate it. If there is agreement the data is
> useful and legitimate; similar to the BP import, I wondered if I could
> ask for help, perhaps reapplying Johns' BP import code
On 09/12/2009, at 11:57 PM, Mark Pulley wrote:
On 08/12/2009, at 12:27 AM, Nick Hocking wrote:
BTW, my new years resolution is to survey Gundagai. It's a total
discrace, It was traced and has never been visited and SURVEYED
properly.
I did some GPS traces of some streets in Gundagai in Nov
Hi,
I think I have found a good datasource for OSM, but I've run out of
steam trying to manipulate it. If there is agreement the data is
useful and legitimate; similar to the BP import, I wondered if I could
ask for help, perhaps reapplying Johns' BP import code/procedure to
this dataset?
Queensl
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, you wrote:
> 2009/12/11 Elizabeth Dodd :
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, you wrote:
> >> > i then looked for one at blanchetown, and there was no new bp at
> >> > blanchetown, so either its not bp any more, or because the node was
> >> > close the new data has not been imported
> >>
>
2009/12/11 Liz :
> i then looked for one at blanchetown, and there was no new bp at blanchetown,
> so either its not bp any more, or because the node was close the new data has
> not been imported
I think you found it, unless you mean there is 2 BPs at Blanchetown?
___
2009/12/11 Liz
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
> > The long awaited National Public Toilet Map has been released in XML
> > (but not under CC-BY like many reports recommended) @
> > http://data.australia.gov.au/610
> >
> > Instead, it's a click through licence that amongst ot
2009/12/11 Elizabeth Dodd :
> so we don't need imported data?
>
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Why PD is not better for business
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009
> From: paul youlten
> To: Liz
>
> Liz,
>
> The coastline I did back in the "old days" was between Has
On 11/12/2009, at 8:02 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> so we don't need imported data?
In most cases we don't need imported data, but it can be useful. For example
rather than painstakingly crafting the entire coastline of Australia from a few
GPS traces and a lot of imagery (much is relatively inac
so we don't need imported data?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Why PD is not better for business
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009
From: paul youlten
To: Liz
Liz,
The coastline I did back in the "old days" was between Hastings in
Sussex and Folkestone in Kent. I did th
2009/12/11 Liz :
> the one i did i dragged the node to the surveyed place, merged the two, and
> left the source as bp?; survey
I'd do it:
source=bp.com
source:location=survey
> i then looked for one at blanchetown, and there was no new bp at blanchetown,
> so either its not bp any more, or beca
2009/12/11 Liz :
> a clear piece of evidence that getting Au data licensed for ODbL is going to
> be like pushing excreta uphill
As James pointed out, CC-BY should be compatible, if all the other
data on the site is licensed as such why wasn't this data set?
__
2009/12/11 James Livingston :
> http://apps.nowwhere.com.au/caltex/austlocator/search.aspx
I wouldn't bother with nowwhere, it's a mapds website and they are
most likely hosting the data on behalf of caltex, and so they probably
wouldn't be able or willing to release the data.
> http://www.shell.
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
> The long awaited National Public Toilet Map has been released in XML
> (but not under CC-BY like many reports recommended) @
> http://data.australia.gov.au/610
>
> Instead, it's a click through licence that amongst other Proprietary
> terms requi
2009/12/11 Arie Paap :
> How should duplicates which are already in OSM (but weren't close
> enough to be picked up when processed) be dealt with? For example BP
> Bellevue:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-31.8941&lon=116.0263&zoom=17&layers=B000FTF
> (both appear on southern side of Great Ea
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Arie Paap wrote:
> How should duplicates which are already in OSM (but weren't close
> enough to be picked up when processed) be dealt with? For example BP
> Bellevue:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-31.8941&lon=116.0263&zoom=17&layers=B000
>FTF (both appear on southern si
2009/12/11 Alex (Maxious) Sadleir :
> The long awaited National Public Toilet Map has been released in XML
> (but not under CC-BY like many reports recommended) @
> http://data.australia.gov.au/610
>
> Instead, it's a click through licence that amongst other Proprietary
> terms requires anybody wit
16 matches
Mail list logo
