Re: [talk-au] access=destination

2010-01-24 Thread Roy Wallace
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Roy Wallace wrote: > > ... I've emailed QLD gov and Brisbane CC about what the signs mean, > though I'm not holding my breath for a response... An email response from the "Road Safety & System Management Division, Department of Transport and Main Roads" (QLD): --

Re: [talk-au] access=destination

2010-01-24 Thread Liz
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Roy Wallace wrote: > > ... I've emailed QLD gov and Brisbane CC about what the signs mean, > > though I'm not holding my breath for a response... > > An email response from the "Road Safety & System Management Division, >

Re: [talk-au] access=destination

2010-01-24 Thread Roy Wallace
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Liz wrote: > > Great work Roy Cheers :) > (not providing any suggestions) Alright how's this > > It is an advisory sign to all road users advising the street is not > > intended to be used by through traffic, however vehicles are the > > primary target (bic

Re: [talk-au] access=destination

2010-01-24 Thread Stephen Hope
2010/1/25 Roy Wallace : > >> > "The 'Local Traffic Only' sign is an advisory sign only and is not >> > regulatory. > > I don't think this is important, but this could be specified using > motor_vehicle:regulatory=no (or inferred from > motor_vehicle:source="Local Traffic Only sign") Actually, thi