On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:39 PM, John Henderson wrote:
> I note the wiki says that "Direction of the way should be downstream."
>
> Most streams I look at on OSM have been drawn uphill, and I've been
> reversing the direction of ones I notice as wrong. Indeed, I find it more
> natural to draw str
On 28 July 2010 13:39, John Henderson wrote:
> Most streams I look at on OSM have been drawn uphill, and I've been
> reversing the direction of ones I notice as wrong. Indeed, I find it more
> natural to draw streams that way myself, and then reverse them.
Sometimes it's hard to figure out which
I note the wiki says that "Direction of the way should be downstream."
Most streams I look at on OSM have been drawn uphill, and I've been
reversing the direction of ones I notice as wrong. Indeed, I find it
more natural to draw streams that way myself, and then reverse them.
This is just to
On 28 July 2010 08:28, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Okay, the only reason I was unsure is because if you only change part
> of the way from nearmap imagery then you have part sourced from
> nearmap, and part sourced from yahoo or survey.
In that case, while far from ideal, but more accurate, you could
> As John suggested if you modify a way that was tagged source=yahoo using
> nearmap then it should be changed to source=nearmap. It's no different to
> changing from source=yahoo to source=survey when updating to something that
> is now gps traced.
Okay, the only reason I was unsure is becaus
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Simon Biber wrote:
> If there's a way tagged:
>
> highway=residential
> name=Leigh Street
> source=survey
>
> And the positioning is obviously sub-standard (such as a single node for a 90
> degree turn, where the street actually curves with a radi
If there's a way tagged:
highway=residential
name=Leigh Street
source=survey
And the positioning is obviously sub-standard (such as a single node for a 90
degree turn, where the street actually curves with a radius of 10 to 20
metres),
I would add, say, 4 more nodes to approximate the
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:27:19 +1000
John Smith wrote:
> On 27 July 2010 22:54, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> > I'd be cautious about changing anything that is source=survey (gps or
> > otherwise) though to source=nearmap. I have done this in a couple of
> > places but it's thing's like a road being ma
On 27 July 2010 22:54, Ross Scanlon wrote:
> I'd be cautious about changing anything that is source=survey (gps or
> otherwise) though to source=nearmap. I have done this in a couple of places
> but it's thing's like a road being made dual carriage way when it was
> originally a single carriag
> Also if I add a node to a way and tag that node as a highway:crossing
> positioned by nearmap imagery, should I just add source:nearmap to
> that new node? I ask because I came across I crossing node with no
> source tag, so I'm not sure if this implies the source was the same as
> the way that t
On 27 July 2010 21:07, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> If an existing way was marked as source:yahoo, but I made some minor
> alterations from nearmap imagery what should I do to the source?
> Should I leave it as source:yahoo and add source:nearmap to the
> changeset? Or should I change the source:yahoo t
I have some questions about using the source tag.
If an existing way was marked as source:yahoo, but I made some minor
alterations from nearmap imagery what should I do to the source?
Should I leave it as source:yahoo and add source:nearmap to the
changeset? Or should I change the source:yahoo to
12 matches
Mail list logo
