On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:35:58 +1100
Nick Hocking wrote:
> JohnSmith wrote
>
> "I originally cc'd my original email to the HOT list as well, however
> it would see they doesn't bother trying to help unless you are a 3rd
> world country with a high chance of PR..."
>
> Given the incessant trolling
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
>
> > Something like:
> > flood_prone=yes
> > flood_prone:height=*
> >
> > Obviously, we'd need to carefully define "height" (is it normally with
> > respect to some marker, or with respect to sea level, etc.?) Anyway,
> > the idea is that thi
On 15 January 2011 17:35, Nick Hocking wrote:
> JohnSmith wrote
>
> "I originally cc'd my original email to the HOT list as well, however
> it would see they doesn't bother trying to help unless you are a 3rd
> world country with a high chance of PR..."
>
> Given the incessant trolling and cyber-s
On 15 January 2011 11:02, John Smith wrote:
> Last I heard the death toll was at 16 for Qld, I'm not aware if there
> has been any deaths in other states.
I just heard that one person from Grantham, their body was found 86 km away.
___
Talk-au mailing
JohnSmith wrote
"I originally cc'd my original email to the HOT list as well, however
it would see they doesn't bother trying to help unless you are a 3rd
world country with a high chance of PR..."
Given the incessant trolling and cyber-stalking of OSM by some vocal
Australians, I'd be suprised i
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 07:57:49 +0100
"waldo000...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Elizabeth Dodd
> wrote:
> >
> > > > flood_prone=yes
> > >
> > > Need to expand it a little to cover how often that level is
> > > likely to occur etc and/or height above the normal river level.
>
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
>
> > > flood_prone=yes
> >
> > Need to expand it a little to cover how often that level is likely to
> > occur etc and/or height above the normal river level.
>
> Jan 2010 added to it somehow would be adequate?
I think it would be better to
It's all collected at the same time, but to speed up processing we left the
multiview out of this pass (it'll get done later) so that the Ipswitch and
river mouth surveys get online faster
cheers
b
On 15 January 2011 13:28, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Ben Last wrote:
> Hi - yes, in the interests of time we skipped Multiview for these surveys so
> as to get the PhotoMaps up faster.
> cheers
> b
So you guys didn't collect the multiview imagery, or is it processing
and will be up at a later date?
The terrain look
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:03:10 +0800
Ben Last wrote:
> Er... there's lots! Most of the FairFax media sites picked up the
> Sydney Morning Herald article yesterday,
>
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/flood-devastation-mapped-by-highres-sky-cams-20110
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Brendan Morley wrote:
> Folks
>
> NearMap's flood run of Brisbane is partially online. e.g. in the CBD
> through to Oxley Creek at least.
>
> Sam Vekemans has expressed interest to me in helping trace the flood line.
>
> All I can say to that right now is please t
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:04:01 +1100
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
>
> >
> > ps. does anyone have a time stamp for exactly when the flood reached
> > peak height?
>
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/infographics/qld-floods/height.htm
>
> ___
>
taken from this d
>
> ps. does anyone have a time stamp for exactly when the flood reached
> peak height?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/infographics/qld-floods/height.htm
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:55:14 +1000
John Smith wrote:
> On 15 January 2011 12:52, 4x4falcon wrote:
> >>
> >> I have no idea what to tag it, I'm sure you'll work something out.
> >>
> >>
> >> Brendan
> >
> >
> > flood_prone=yes
>
> Need to expand it a little to cover how often that level is likel
Er... there's lots! Most of the FairFax media sites picked up the Sydney
Morning Herald article yesterday, and now that the latest Brisbane CBD and
Oxley surveys are up, the Brisbane Courier Mail and Brisbane Times linked
directly to us this morning (both seem to be rotating many stories about the
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:29:01 +0800
Ben Last wrote:
> Also: we're being linked like crazy from several major media sources,
> so if you can ensure you have a decent-size browser cache and avoid
> trying to spider down large areas of tiles, that'd be very helpful in
> reducing the load (currently a
Hi - yes, in the interests of time we skipped Multiview for these surveys so
as to get the PhotoMaps up faster.
cheers
b
On 15 January 2011 11:54, Stephen Hope wrote:
> Ben,
>
> some interesting shots there. I take it the MultiView part won't be
> up until later? It seems to be showing older i
JOSM 3751 has the nearmap slippymap (i think that's the older josm).
My idea is to use josm for the detailed tracing, then use qgis to
convert it to a .shp file layer.
Then upload it to koordinates.com as a public layer called 'your
version of floodmess area'.
If many people do this, then we h
On 15 January 2011 13:57, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> You can use NearMaps current tile API in josm 3751, as I described on
> the wiki, No redirecting necessary,
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#version_3751.2B
> This is what it should look like, http://andrew.liway.net/josm-image
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 15 January 2011 11:38, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>> I've updated the details, for version 3751.
>
> I wonder if Ben would be so kind as to have a standard tile URL, I
> haven't dug into the current TMS/WMS code to see if you can supply
> custom U
Ben,
some interesting shots there. I take it the MultiView part won't be
up until later? It seems to be showing older imagery at the moment.
A little bit of unfortunate image slicing here in just the wrong place. :)
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.475182,153.020904&z=20&t=k&nmd=20110113
And I
On 15 January 2011 13:29, Ben Last wrote:
> The URL format is pretty much Google-compatible, and there's also the format
> that was added for Potlatch (with the three ! characters).
> See
> http://forum.nearmap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=751&p=1262&hilit=url+format#p1262
Might be google comp
The URL format is pretty much Google-compatible, and there's also the format
that was added for Potlatch (with the three ! characters).
See
http://forum.nearmap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=751&p=1262&hilit=url+format#p1262
Please note that I'm not making any specific comment whatsoever regardin
On 15 January 2011 12:52, 4x4falcon wrote:
>>
>> I have no idea what to tag it, I'm sure you'll work something out.
>>
>>
>> Brendan
>
>
> flood_prone=yes
Need to expand it a little to cover how often that level is likely to
occur etc and/or height above the normal river level.
_
I have no idea what to tag it, I'm sure you'll work something out.
Brendan
flood_prone=yes
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 15 January 2011 12:37, Brendan Morley wrote:
> I have no idea what to tag it, I'm sure you'll work something out.
waterway=flood_plain ?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 15 January 2011 12:15, 4x4falcon wrote:
> Already done this using the BTC redirect but was hoping to use the
> "SlippyMap Plugin Custom Tile Source" method as the redirect is very slow.
Same thing for tiles...
Slippy map integrated with WMS, tms = tile map source (I assume)
This is what I wa
Folks
NearMap's flood run of Brisbane is partially online. e.g. in the CBD
through to Oxley Creek at least.
Sam Vekemans has expressed interest to me in helping trace the flood line.
All I can say to that right now is please trace not just to the level of
the visible floodwater but also the
On 15/01/11 10:06, John Smith wrote:
On 15 January 2011 12:03, 4x4falcon wrote:
How do you get it to show on the imagery menu list?
Add another layer to the list:
tms:http://localhost:/
Or something to that effect, depending where you are pulling the images from.
Already done this using t
On 15 January 2011 12:03, 4x4falcon wrote:
> How do you get it to show on the imagery menu list?
Add another layer to the list:
tms:http://localhost:/
Or something to that effect, depending where you are pulling the images from.
___
Talk-au mailing l
On 15/01/11 09:38, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've updated the details, for version 3751.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
JOSM versions on the wiki,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#SlippyMa
I had a look to see if a simple revert in JOSM was possible. For some reason
probably because it was a huge change and others had edited since, JOSM
couldn't find some history and would just fail. I then gave up.
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: 4x4falcon [mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com]
On 15 January 2011 11:38, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I've updated the details, for version 3751.
I wonder if Ben would be so kind as to have a standard tile URL, I
haven't dug into the current TMS/WMS code to see if you can supply
custom URLs, alternatively using a web server to do a http redirect
se
I contacted the user and he will duplicate the coastline. I agree that the
best option is to duplicate.
Ill have a check on it after he is finished.
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Dodd [mailto:ed...@billiau.net]
Sent: Saturday, 15 January 2011 6:07 AM
To: talk-au@openstree
I've updated the details, for version 3751.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
> JOSM versions on the wiki,
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#SlippyMap_Plugin_Custom_Tile_Source
>
_
On 15/01/11 03:37, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:46:08 +1030
"Markus_g" wrote:
Hello,
Someone has added coastline to the administration boundaries from the
SA border to Port Philip Bay and removed the old coastline. There
edit comment was "removed malformed Victorian/SE SA coas
On 15 January 2011 11:29, John Smith wrote:
> Here's a couple of interesting things I found:
>
> http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=NaN,NaN&z=20&t=k&nmd=20110113
Hmmm looks like I hit a bug :D
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.541924,152.944222&z=19&t=k&nmd=20110113
___
On 15 January 2011 11:03, Ben Last wrote:
> Just FYI, the nearmap.com images of the Brisbane CBD are now up - 2cm
> resolution and taken on the 13th (from plane to web in 36 hours). Next up
> will be Ipswich at some point this weekend.
> http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.470182,153.027835&z=16&t=k
Just FYI, the nearmap.com images of the Brisbane CBD are now up - 2cm
resolution and taken on the 13th (from plane to web in 36 hours). Next up
will be Ipswich at some point this weekend.
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.470182,153.027835&z=16&t=k
b
On 12 January 2011 18:39, John Smith wrote:
> O
On 15 January 2011 10:45, Richard Weait wrote:
> Perhaps somebody familiar with the affected areas could create a list
> of specific ways that remote mappers can help? Tasks that include
> specific geographic starting points and limited scope are easier to
> act on.
Almost all eastern states of
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:02 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Not sure how useful it'd be in Australia, but the massive floods all
> over Australia, except for the bush fires near Perth of course, might
> do well to map a lot of effected areas from Bing where coverage
> exists.
and then ...
On Fri, Jan 1
I originally cc'd my original email to the HOT list as well, however
it would see they doesn't bother trying to help unless you are a 3rd
world country with a high chance of PR...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreet
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:46:08 +1030
"Markus_g" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone has added coastline to the administration boundaries from the
> SA border to Port Philip Bay and removed the old coastline. There
> edit comment was "removed malformed Victorian/SE SA coastlines and
> added 'coastline' tag
Hello,
Someone has added coastline to the administration boundaries from the SA
border to Port Philip Bay and removed the old coastline. There edit comment
was "removed malformed Victorian/SE SA coastlines and added 'coastline' tag
to administrative boundaries to form accurate coastlines"
The di
44 matches
Mail list logo
