-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Johnson
Date: 28 January 2011 15:50
Subject: [Aust-NZ] FYI: Government encourages use of open source software
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Some good news:
Government encourages use of open source software
http://www.governmentnews.com.au/2011/0
On 27 January 2011 22:04, Stephen Hope wrote:
> interfering with each other. Then I started finding problems where
> sometimes they were connected, sometime they weren't, sometimes the
> boundary and road way was the same thing (so if you hide them the road
> vanishes as well). So now I just fil
On 27 January 2011 21:06 wrote:
> * ABS2006 boundaries don't follow coastlines when coastlines change.
What about when coastlines haven't changed, but when the ABS2006
boundary drifts from the coastline?
The answer here, is we don't know whether they intended to follow the
coastline and the coa
On 27/01/11 19:17, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:21 PM, 4x4falcon wrote:
So your mapping for the renderer.
I'm mapping for renderers, yes.
Why, what are *you* mapping for?
Basic premise of openstreetmap has always been "Don't map for the
renderers" map what is on the grou
On 27 January 2011 21:17, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Note to self: add feature to hide and render unselectable all admin=boundary.
I used to always do this (using Josm filters) when working in country
areas around Qld, the shire boundaries and roads were always
interfering with each other. Then I st
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:01:46 +0800
4x4falcon wrote:
> What was the source of this if you don't mind me asking as I'm sure
> Steve will.
Me
I said that boundaries stay put whether they are right or wrong
don't move with roads moving
don't move if the coastline erodes.
too late at night to look
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:21 PM, 4x4falcon wrote:
> So your mapping for the renderer.
I'm mapping for renderers, yes.
Why, what are *you* mapping for?
> Is it colinear or close nodes, without looking at in an editor?
>
> If you look in an editor such as josm you will see that its two separate
>
On 27/01/11 18:06, {withheld} wrote:
On 27/01/11 20:21, 4x4falcon wrote:
On 27/01/11 14:12, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:10 PM, 4x4falcon wrote:
Physical things can change (eg road or railway realignment), non
physical
don't necessarily change. In the case of boundaries do
On 27/01/11 20:21, 4x4falcon wrote:
> On 27/01/11 14:12, Steve Bennett wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:10 PM, 4x4falcon wrote:
>>> Physical things can change (eg road or railway realignment), non
>>> physical
>>> don't necessarily change. In the case of boundaries do we definitely
>>> know
>>
On 27/01/11 14:12, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:10 PM, 4x4falcon wrote:
Physical things can change (eg road or railway realignment), non physical
don't necessarily change. In the case of boundaries do we definitely know
that when a road is realigned does the boundary change w
10 matches
Mail list logo