Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?

2011-02-05 Thread Stephen Hope
On 5 February 2011 15:30, Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@gmail.com wrote: Surely that can't be correct? That is the way it was explained on one of the mailing lists a while back. I haven't seen any notice that it is going to change, though with the mushroom treatment we're getting, I could have

Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?

2011-02-05 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@gmail.com To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 5:30 AM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset? On 3 February 2011 08:38, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?

2011-02-05 Thread Richard Weait
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:34 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote: [ ... ] I presume that some time in the next 7 weeks (ie before 31 March 2011) it might be made more apparent what will happen, since in order for an ODbL complaint database to be available on 1 April I trust that

Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?

2011-02-05 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:45:52 -0500 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: A small thing perhaps, but the next step requested by the board prior to 31 March is Phase 3, which adds the decline option to the current accept option. I expect that the improved CTs (1.2.4) will be available at the