On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Ben Last wrote:
> James; all I can say is that the paragraph in question was written by our
> General Counsel specifically to allow existing contributions to stay in
> place. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment on interpretation!
> Regards
>
>
Hi Ben,
I'd lik
On 16 June 2011 15:01, Gary Gallagher wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments, I think I'll hold off. It does seem
> unfortunate that there is no basic work-flow to convert a boundary into
> a relation containing the ways that make it up. From what you've said
> Nick merging nodes still keeps them as
Thanks for all the comments, I think I'll hold off. It does seem
unfortunate that there is no basic work-flow to convert a boundary into
a relation containing the ways that make it up. From what you've said
Nick merging nodes still keeps them as separate ways just stacked on top
of each other - whi
On 16/06/11 10:21, David Groom wrote:
> I should have added how impressed I am with the generous attitude that
> Nearmap has taken in regards to these past contributions, please pass my
> thanks on to those concerned.
I second that. I'm delighted that I can now accept the new terms
without los
James; all I can say is that the paragraph in question was written by our
General Counsel specifically to allow existing contributions to stay in
place. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment on interpretation!
Regards
Ben
PS: TRS80? I'm old enough to have owned one when they were new :(
On 1
On 16 June 2011 07:48, Ben Last wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 19:52, David Groom wrote:
>>
>> sorry to be pedantic, but when you say "the second paragraph allows edits
>> submitted before the 17th of June 2011 under CC-BY-SA (i.e., by someone who
>> hadn't accepted the new CTs
>> at the time of submi
- Original Message -
From: "David Groom"
To: "OSM Australian Talk List" ; "Licensing and
other legal discussions."
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission
ofderived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStreetMap
-
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Last"
To: "David Groom" ; "OSM Australian Talk List"
; "Licensing and other legal discussions."
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of
derived works from PhotoMaps to OpenStre
On 15 June 2011 19:52, David Groom wrote:
>
> sorry to be pedantic, but when you say "the second paragraph allows edits
> submitted before the 17th of June 2011 under CC-BY-SA (i.e., by someone who
> hadn't accepted the new CTs
> at the time of submission) . to stay in the database", do yo
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Last"
To: "OpenStreetMap Learned Discussions" ; "OSM
Australian Talk List" ; "Licensing and other
legal discussions."
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:30 AM
Subject: [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding submission of
derived works from PhotoMaps
10 matches
Mail list logo
