On 03/12/11 10:47, Steve Bennett wrote:
To play Devil's Advocate here, does anyone actually want the suburb
boundaries retained (or reimported)? To me, they've always been a
big pain in the arse - they get in the way when you're trying to map,
they show up in various renderings and add noise, th
On 3 December 2011 08:06, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2011 10:48 AM, "Steve Bennett" wrote:
> >
> > To play Devil's Advocate here, does anyone actually want the suburb
> > boundaries retained (or reimported)? To me, they've always been a big
> > pain in the arse.
>
> I don't think it is be
On Dec 3, 2011 10:48 AM, "Steve Bennett" wrote:
>
> To play Devil's Advocate here, does anyone actually want the suburb
> boundaries retained (or reimported)? To me, they've always been a big
> pain in the arse.
I don't think it is being devil's advocate.
OSM shouldn't be a dumping ground for fr
I personally want them kept. Now that we have bing imagery covering more areas,
there is less reliance on using them for getting other data (creeks and roads)
out of the boundaries. When we imported the boundaries, all we had was crappy
yahoo and GPS traces. I think users know to not touch them
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> What will get removed? The relations? The ways? The points? I guess this is
> a question bigger than just the ABS data, but given how integrated this
> import is with other data, the impact would be significant.
>
> How on earth would we plan fo
On 02/12/2011, at 2:13 PM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default
> residential speed limit in Australia) and these edits could be "re-edited" by
> an actual bot. Given that these edits are easy to identify, and the large
> number of ways, this
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:17 PM, SomeoneElse wrote:
> On 02/12/2011 04:47, El Segundo Can't win wrote:
>
>
> There are two types of re-mapping - on the ground re-mapping, and desktop
> re-mapping.
>
>
> There's also arguably a third - re-adding edits lost as a result of removal
> of non-CT edits us
On 02/12/2011 04:47, El Segundo Can't win wrote:
There are two types of re-mapping - on the ground re-mapping, and
desktop re-mapping.
There's also arguably a third - re-adding edits lost as a result of
removal of non-CT edits using notes taken at the time of the original
on-the-ground mapp
On 2 December 2011 09:43, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Are you the same person as user id:28334 "laughton_andrew" who has
> declined? If you think that government data inclusion is likely to
> convince other mappers, is it enough for you? Do you have other
> issues that you wish to s
On 02/12/11 12:27, Andrew Laughton wrote:
I would like a copy of the map before these deletes are made for my
GPS, has someone done this before these deletes were done ?
I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for, but I've got a copy of
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/australia-oceania.osm.
Well I'm waiting on licencing of the ABS data as it seems unclear if this is
covered by data.gov.au's ok as it predates data.gov.au .
Even if ABS data turns out to have an incompatible licence, I hope to have
time closer to the official cut-out date to save whatever data I easily can.
Hundreds of
11 matches
Mail list logo