I agree we need to think about the map, not the rules.
look at the first map you see when you type OSM into google.
Its a map of europe.
It shows London, prague, and warsaw but not paris or berlin.
Lisbon but not madrid, budapest but not rome.
And here, at a slightly different zoom level we
Arrgh, I've just noted that I havn't sent this to the list but as a direct
reply. So here another try:
2012/12/12 Nathan Van Der Meulen
> I completely disagree that population alone should be used to classify a
> location (unless the populations are seriously reduced). Going by the
> suggested
On 12/12/12 23:35, Nathan Van Der Meulen wrote:
I completely disagree that population alone should be used to
classify a location (unless the populations are seriously reduced).
Going by the suggested populations, places like Tenterfield, Glen
Innes, Charleville will become villages and Norseman,
I completely disagree that population alone should be used to classify a
location (unless the populations are seriously reduced). Going by the
suggested populations, places like Tenterfield, Glen Innes, Charleville will
become villages and Norseman, Laverton and Lockhart hamlets.
The populatio
4 matches
Mail list logo