Re: [talk-au] cities changed to towns

2012-12-12 Thread Nathan Van Der Meulen
I completely disagree that population alone should be used to classify a location (unless the populations are seriously reduced).  Going by the suggested populations, places like Tenterfield, Glen Innes, Charleville will become villages and Norseman, Laverton and Lockhart hamlets. The

Re: [talk-au] cities changed to towns

2012-12-12 Thread John Henderson
On 12/12/12 23:35, Nathan Van Der Meulen wrote: I completely disagree that population alone should be used to classify a location (unless the populations are seriously reduced). Going by the suggested populations, places like Tenterfield, Glen Innes, Charleville will become villages and

[talk-au] Fwd: cities changed to towns

2012-12-12 Thread Michael Krämer
Arrgh, I've just noted that I havn't sent this to the list but as a direct reply. So here another try: 2012/12/12 Nathan Van Der Meulen natvan...@yahoo.com I completely disagree that population alone should be used to classify a location (unless the populations are seriously reduced). Going

Re: [talk-au] cities changed to towns- I made Alice Springs a city.

2012-12-12 Thread Adrian Plaskitt
I agree we need to think about the map, not the rules. look at the first map you see when you type OSM into google. Its a map of europe. It shows London, prague, and warsaw but not paris or berlin. Lisbon but not madrid, budapest but not rome. And here, at a slightly different zoom level