Hi
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in
national and state parks?
For example, Ant Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do not
create additional trails and only use
Hi,
I’ve noticed that the SA Survey marks have been released as open data on the
27th of July (3 days ago)
https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/survey-marks-and-survey-mark-plans-reference
https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/survey-marks-and-survey-mark-plans-reference
This should be quite
On 30/07/2015 10:20 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi
What (if any) is the correct tagging for unauthorised trails in
national and state parks?
For example, Ant Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-37.92599/145.32051
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike
If the path exists then shouldn't it be tagged access=no + foot=yes?
From:fors...@ozonline.com.au fors...@ozonline.com.au
Date:Thu, 30 Jul, 2015 at 11:53
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks for the replies
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked
I lean towards mapping what's physically there, so if the trail exists I
think it's ok to map it if you want to.
If the trail is blocked by a fence/barrier and signage saying keep out
etc, then I think access=no would be appropriate as it's facts based on
what's physically there.
I also
The access issues get very murchy very quickly.
We have a Forestry area that is clearly signposted for bikes to stick
to vehicle tracks, however for 10 years or more Forestry has sponsored
volunteer mountain bikers to build and maintain trails in this area.
Go figure.
Parks have a category for
Hi
We have much the same issue with walking tracks and old surveying/mining roads
is Tasmania. Parks has played a very dominating roll with Tasmapi it is
actually dangerous as you can be standing on a made road/track and as it does
not appear on the map you can get confused and lost. Also
On 30 July 2015 at 11:52, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked off.
Parks Vic prefers light handed regulation so I used mild language to
describe the track status.
On 7/29/2015 6:52 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Possibly tag it access=no and rename it to Track closed depending on
how widely the name Ant Track is known. It may be known as Ant Track
by a very small group of riders.
The name might not be Ant Track, but it's almost certainly not Track
On 30 July 2015 at 10:20, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
I have spoken with Parks Vic and they request that bike riders do not
create additional trails and only use official trails. They would prefer if
such unofficial trails were not mapped or named because it implies official
status to
10 matches
Mail list logo