Agree with most things you said Stev...
But for the copyright map thing. 'We' should not be using copyright maps
for anything in OSM. I do use copyright maps .. usually for planning
trips ... along with OSM or course. Once the trip is completed I use my
trip generated knowledge to add/improve
I agree David,
Hence why these tracks were left just as highway=path
Stephen.
Sent:Monday, August 10, 2015 at 2:11 PM
From:David Clark dbcl...@fastmail.com.au
To:talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
I come acrosssimilar
Hi all
Sorry, I referred to signs and brochures as 'maps' in my last mail,
yes they do contain maps which can't inform our decision, but they
also contain text information which can.
Tony
Thanks stev391 and others for the feedback and the welcome.
Re real world indications of bicycle=no,
I come across similar situations quite often and you could write an
essay on access to each individual trail but it's not worth it and still
doesn't improve the accuracy or clarity.
My opinion is that the situation is sufficiently vague enough that I
wouldn't tag any specific access or
Thanks stev391 and others for the feedback and the welcome.
Re real world indications of bicycle=no, there is a lot of signage in
the area indicating that only formed and signed bike trails can be
used and that the creation and use of other tracks is illegal.
Thanks Tony for providing your images.
I see those signs quite often and dont register them when I ride.
https://app.box.com/s/wawk2d19abv5ic65h5daslgqj6xrhqut
If this sign is to be taken literally (as in what is on the ground) the only formed management trail is the Dargon Track and Lanes
6 matches
Mail list logo