Re: [talk-au] Legal access to Public land ...

On 7/7/2016 12:35 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Hi Even with Warin's proposed edit to the wiki guidelines, I think it is still unclear whether its better to use the value 'private' or 'no' for the 'access' key. (And the various transport mode keys). For example, for tracks in national p

Re: [talk-au] Legal access to Public land ...

Hi Even with Warin's proposed edit to the wiki guidelines, I think it is still unclear whether its better to use the value 'private' or 'no' for the 'access' key. (And the various transport mode keys). For example, for tracks in national parks and closed water catchments which have more r

Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia

I notice aaronsta already reverted 40195731 so I tried to revert 40195392 40195333 40195330 40195315 40171955 40066399 40065907 40065268 40064728 40064280 40053210 40052929 40052639 40052416 40052185 40051946 40051763 These ones worked 40195392 40195315 40195330 40195333 40171955 40053210 but the

Re: [talk-au] Legal access to Public land ...

On 7/5/2016 9:13 AM, Mark Pulley wrote: On 2 Jul 2016, at 3:30 pm, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 7/2/2016 9:26 AM, Frank wrote: OpenStreetMap Wiki page Australian Tagging Guidelines has been changed on 1 July 2016 by Swanilli to say that the public has a legal right to access public