I notice aaronsta already reverted 40195731 so I tried to revert 40195392 40195333 40195330 40195315 40171955 40066399 40065907 40065268 40064728 40064280 40053210 40052929 40052639 40052416 40052185 40051946 40051763
These ones worked 40195392 40195315 40195330 40195333 40171955 40053210 but the rest I got errors GET https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/40051763/download... 408 Request Timeout (17b) so they didn't revert. On 5 July 2016 at 21:39, cleary <o...@97k.com> wrote: > > I don't have the knowledge to run scripts safely, so it would be good if you > could do this. Thanks. > > > > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 09:34 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > > On 5 Jul 2016 8:26 PM, "cleary" <o...@97k.com> wrote: > >> I have been looking at some South Australian administrative boundaries. >> The South Australia / Western Australia border is a bit messy and I was >> looking to see it I could sort it out. I realised that some of the data >> is part of the recently reported illegal imports of WA data - includes >> some LGA and locality boundaries. Not sure I can solve the border issue >> completely but I am uncomfortable about the illegal data. Is it OK to >> delete recently added WA Government data from this user, aaronsta ? > > I was hoping Data Working Group could help out by removing the history since > this that appears to be infringing copyright. However in the meantime maybe > we should just revert which at least means it's not directly visible. > > I would steer clear of manual work, and try to run a revert script. I had > luck with the woodpeck revert scripts. Did you want to do this, or want me > to have a go? > > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
