Thanks Warin
Wasn't sure of how best to respond to them?
Thanks
Graeme
On 6 February 2017 at 14:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have made a changeset comment ... I hope they respond.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45454430
>
> My Comment is
> "The changeset comment
I have made a changeset comment ... I hope they respond.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45454430
My Comment is
"The changeset comment "These places are important" is subjective. Far
better to state something like "added park in my local area."
I have added the playgrounds to these
Perhaps a good use for this kind of data would be a feed of *buildings not
mapped*
IE:
- Grab data as you are doing or via a platform like morph.io
- Overpass queries to find out if there is any building geometry at given
coordinates
- Produce an RSS feed or similar (Maproulette? To-fix?)
I
On 06-Feb-17 10:14 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On 6 February 2017 at 06:42, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why use Bing Maps?
For OSM it would be far better to use the LIP Base map for the address data
and then use the LPI Imagery for the building footprint.
That aside and the scraping of
On 6 February 2017 at 06:42, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why use Bing Maps?
>
> For OSM it would be far better to use the LIP Base map for the address data
> and then use the LPI Imagery for the building footprint.
That aside and the scraping of the original data aside, would we even
On 3 February 2017 at 10:08, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> The ones I looked at were http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45454430/ (the zig-zag
> made me wonder?) & http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45454374/ (a nice straight
> rectangular path?).
In my opinion, for the first one, it does seem
Why use Bing Maps?
For OSM it would be far better to use the LIP Base map for the address
data and then use the LPI Imagery for the building footprint.
On 05-Feb-17 01:59 PM, Timur Behlul wrote:
Hi All,
I have been scraping rental properties off the net for an analysis I
am doing on
7 matches
Mail list logo