[talk-au] Perth Canning Rv wetland Relation: 8337801

Hi, I have repaired Relation: 8337801 - wetland marsh that had been altered by an Apple person. It was identified by OSMinspector as a probable error (and boy was it). It is now closed and has no crossing members. So technically better. But I am far from local .. so it lacks verification. I

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 30 May 2018 19:17 To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland I quoted the whole off-list "discussion" with Thorsten. Since it was short and not controversial, I assumed it was in error not using

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 30/05/18 18:10, Jonathon Rossi wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:34 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. Problem: Personal discussion being sh

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:34 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: > > I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. >> > > Problem: Personal discussion being shown on public list.. > If you want more than the two of you to contribute then hol

Re: [talk-au] Small culverts/bridges in bushland

On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote: I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges. Problem: Personal discussion being shown on public list.. If you want more than the two of you  to contribute then hold the discussion here. :) I'd like to, but the problem it causes is th