On 30/05/18 16:03, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
I would say both of these should be mapped as bridges.
Problem: Personal discussion being shown on public list..
If you want more than the two of you to contribute then hold the
discussion here. :)
I'd like to, but the problem it causes is that trails in national
parks and bushland are usually named, and MTB trails have other tags
including difficulty ratings. By splitting these trails to add tiny
bridges it makes it harder to maintain consistent tags on separate
highways, I know of a few trails with half a dozen tiny bridges.
Do you see this as a problem? Or do you think I'm just making a storm
in a teacup?
Routes can be had in a relation containing many things including bridges.
The difficulty rating could be placed on separate sections - the
individual ways, or placed in the relation as the same for all the route
... depends on how much detail you want to get.
If the trail has the same name along all its length .. there is no
problem in splitting it up and having the same name on the separate ways
.. just like there in for highways now.
It is a 'challenge' to maintain some of it .. but it is the truth and so
that should be what is in OSM.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
