Re: [talk-au] Bus stop info

Looks perfect to me. On Wed., 13 Feb. 2019, 3:48 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick Have recently been tagging a number of bus stops, & suddenly had a thought > of Am I doing it right? > > Here's one of them https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6273637341 > > Is that all OK, or should it be done differently in

[talk-au] Bus stop info

Have recently been tagging a number of bus stops, & suddenly had a thought of Am I doing it right? Here's one of them https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6273637341 Is that all OK, or should it be done differently in some way? Thanks Graeme ___

Re: [talk-au] Links with name

Hi Petra, I delete names like on example (2) on sight, it is confusing to give something a name that doesn’t actually have one, or it may be contested and also confuses most routing systems trying to produce meaningful directions and displays on GPS. I’ve never seen case (1) and it looks

Re: [talk-au] Links with name

That third example is part of the residential street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172830002 so that name should be kept. (Should it be reclassified as residential?) Mark P. > On 12 Feb 2019, at 6:22 pm, Petra Rajka - (p) wrote: > links (or other way categories) between dual carriageways