That third example is part of the residential street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172830002 so that name should be kept. (Should it be reclassified as residential?)
Mark P. > On 12 Feb 2019, at 6:22 pm, Petra Rajka - (p) <petra.ra...@telenav.com> wrote: > links (or other way categories) between dual carriageways take the name from > one of the adjacent roads > ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172829556 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172829556>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au