That third example is part of the residential street 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172830002 so that name should be kept. 
(Should it be reclassified as residential?)

Mark P.

> On 12 Feb 2019, at 6:22 pm, Petra Rajka - (p) <petra.ra...@telenav.com> wrote:
> links (or other way categories) between dual carriageways take the name from 
> one of the adjacent roads
> ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172829556 
> <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172829556>
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to