On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 18:25, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I finally managed to get in touch with one of the organisers, and raised
> the licensing/waiver issue. They've said they asked Planet Labs for the
> waiver, I've also independently reached out to the Planet Labs disasters
> contact with
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 08:32, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> There was a proposal back in 2016 (well after the first use of the damage
> tag) and it seems to have stalled, maybe because tagging damage has been
> found to be less effective than hoped
>
>
>
>
>
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 23:37, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> Yes it will go out of date quickly but so does landuse=construction. If
> anything by flagging it as damaged, ruined, razed it attributes this
> feature as needed to be checked again soon.
>
Yep, as I said on the other thread, they all need
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 19:42, Ewen Hill wrote:
>
> I would like to see something a bit smarter than this. Something that can
> assist people on the ground now would be highly beneficial. A "Hell yes, we
> are open" web-site that *small *businesses can advertise would be great.
> A whole lot of
Hi Folks,
There was a proposal back in 2016 (well after the first use of the damage tag)
and it seems to have stalled, maybe because tagging damage has been found to be
less effective than hoped
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/HOT_Damage_Tagging_Proposal
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:27, Phil Wyatt wrote:
>
> From: Russell Deffner
> Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM
> To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
> Cc: h...@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [HOT] damage as a tag - not docu,
>
> Just a quick note; HOT does not formally do damage tagging,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:52, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 6/2/20 8:39 pm, Ewen Hill wrote:
> >The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas
> > now and have followed up with detailed analysis in most. We know what
> > has been damaged, destroyed and what was inhabited,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 20:39, Ewen Hill wrote:
> I will be attending Melbourne however I have deep reservations about this
> and that doesn't include the Waiver which is key to the entire project.
>
> The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas
> now and have followed
Hi Folks,
This just popped into the HOT mailing list - very topical at the moment and may
be worth taking to the SSSI event organisers
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Russell Deffner
Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 9:04 PM
To: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Cc:
On 6/2/20 8:39 pm, Ewen Hill wrote:
The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas
now and have followed up with detailed analysis in most. We know what
has been damaged, destroyed and what was inhabited, what wasn't and what
other assets were damaged. We also know
I will be attending Melbourne however I have deep reservations about this
and that doesn't include the Waiver which is key to the entire project.
The states have sent out a rapid impact assessment teams to all areas now
and have followed up with detailed analysis in most. We know what has been
11 matches
Mail list logo
