Re: [talk-au] Tracks flagged as missing from government data

> I missed the last part where it mentions driveways are included, I'll take > another look to see what can be improved to filter these out. > Andrew, the 1:25,000 Vic gov topo mps show tracks/driveways on private properties in a different colour to those on public land and the map legend clear

Re: [talk-au] Tracks flagged as missing from government data

Thanks for the feedback, On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, at 7:03 PM, Little Maps wrote: > Thanks for a great series of projects Andrew. One query… is there an error in > the Victorian all tracks challenge? It includes nearly 250,000 tracks to be > reviewed and potentially added to OSM. By contrast, taginfo

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

I think this way is wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676954097 It’s currently mapped as a parking aisle, but as far as I can see from the imagery, that appears to actually be a pedestrian area, and not a roadway at all. Yes, very clearly: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-33.85

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

Aug 17, 2021, 00:24 by bjceravo...@gmail.com: > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 21:19, Andrew Harvey <> andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >>> And this one definitely should be inverted: >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761 >>> >> >> Agreed. Surprise no one fixed th

Re: [talk-au] highway=service

On 16/8/21 9:14 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: And this one definitely should be inverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761 Agreed. Surprise no one fixed this already, I've done so now. On Sun, 1