Aug 17, 2021, 00:24 by bjceravo...@gmail.com: > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 21:19, Andrew Harvey <> andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >>> And this one definitely should be inverted: >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/-33.85421/151.06761 >>> >> >> Agreed. Surprise no one fixed this already, I've done so now. >> >> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 19:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <>> >> talk-au@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote: >> >>> Are you allowed as a cyclist to leave sidewalk using them? >>> >> >> Well in NSW you can't cycle on the sidewalk... >> >> >>> >>> Is it OK to use them for u-turn? >>> >> >> Yes. >> > > But you don't need the routing engine to tell you that. So being private is > fine. > For initial/final segment? no so important, though I have seen cases where router took nearest public way (footway) instead of highway=residential and driveway mapping helped it to produce reasonable routing. But sometimes entering footway, pushing small section and leaving footway via driveway is useful in the middle Or leaving cycleway via driveway. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-31.99292&mlon=115.91624#map=19/-31.99292/115.91624 Without mapping public driveways routing would direct cyclists all the way to https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-31.99326&mlon=115.92041#map=18/-31.99326/115.92041 - possibly ignoring this route and proposing an inferior alternative.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
