Re: [talk-au] Use of pedestrian streets to imply route hierarchy

Based on the wiki I understand highway=pedestrian to be for roads that pedestrians freely walk on and some vehicles can drive on, but mostly vehicles don't drive on them because there are too many pedestrians or restrictions limit vehicle access. It's a common misstagging to use it as a more

[talk-au] Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020 dataset available for OSM

Hi the Commonwealth of Australia Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has made the Dedicated Indigenous Protected Areas 2020

Re: [talk-au] Use of pedestrian streets to imply route hierarchy

I repeat something I have said a number of times, say for example, about bicycle infrastructure / routes. Although it can be said about "pedestrian infrastructure / routes" pretty much one-for-one (as bicycle infrastructure / routes). It is this: There is "infrastructure" tagging, like

[talk-au] Use of pedestrian streets to imply route hierarchy

Hello all, I'm a relatively new mapper (1.5 years) using iD, and am hoping to get some clarification on the use of pedestrian streets after some changes were made to my edits. In these changes, pedestrian streets have been used to imply a hierarchy in the footway network, in spite of their