I deleted what appeared to be the superfluous way (which indeed WAS part of the
relation). However, “Route 754” (relation/10974127) seems to need some
additional “role” tags (forward, backward). I’ve edited hundreds, maybe
thousands of routes (bus, bike, road, rail…) but as I’m a
Been looking at OSM Inspector & it is showing an error on a near-by street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id=791590032#map=18/-28.08609/153.42409
The error is being reported as a "Way without tags".
I can see a line there, which appears to be a duplicate of Christine Ave?,
but no
This is an identification of something I have noticed has been going on for
some time (as Phil mentions, since the early '90s, before OSM's time): other
mappers (governments, especially) "use" OSM as a reference, and OSM's data
influence other GISs. In my case, I've been watching as certain
For those with an interest there is also a good youtube video highlighting some
of the issues for managers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXXGkBVJK-o
From: Graeme Fitzpatrick
Sent: Monday, 3 January 2022 12:45 PM
To: OSM-Au
Subject: [talk-au] US Trails Working Group
Happy New
Hi Folks,
Definitely worth a follow especially if you have an interest in informal
tracks/paths/pads and maybe even historical routes that don’t appear on the
ground. I certainly don’t agree with all their statements (especially …. Good
coverage of all trails (including closed or illegal
Happy New Year!
Just noticed mention of this in the weekly Newsletter:
https://www.openstreetmap.us/2021/12/osmus-trails-working-group
Looks like something that we should be following with interest?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
6 matches
Mail list logo
