Re: [talk-au] Bicycle access tags in Victoria and other edits edits

2022-05-15 Thread forster
Hi all I flagged the list of changes below that Sebastian may still dispute, mostly I have reverted his changes without reaching an agreement. Changeset 120382941 MacRobertson bridge is definitely disputed by him. Can I add changeset/120498123, it is early days on this one and Sebastian

Re: [talk-au] Bicycle access tags in Victoria and other edits edits

2022-05-15 Thread Ewen Hill
Hi Highrouleur, Re Changeset 120382605, I am not comfortable that this is not a shared path. This route is used by many families and sports people using the route to get to a number of sporting grounds and is called "Survey Paddock Trail" rather than a path - The signage clearly shows that it

Re: [talk-au] Bicycle access tags in Victoria and other edits edits

2022-05-15 Thread forster
Hi Kim Can I please clarify "using highway=cycleway should only be used where there are signs allowing"? Does this apply to just sidewalks (US sidewalk, UK pavement, AU footpath) or all paths including paths through parkland, beside freeways, rivers and railway lines? Thanks Tony

Re: [talk-au] Proposing a bulk locality edit for new admin_level definitions

2022-05-15 Thread Dian Ă…gesson
Good morning. This change to all localities in Australia has been executed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121025161 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121025214 If you have any concerns or questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Dian On 2022-05-09 14:11, Dian

Re: [talk-au] Bicycle access tags in Victoria and other edits edits

2022-05-15 Thread Kim Oldfield via Talk-au
Responses below. On 15/5/22 13:56, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: Hi Sebastian and list Today I did a number of edits relating to whether a lack of bicycle signage, on its own, is sufficient grounds to remove bicycle=yes/designated or cycleway. Most of my edits though relate to cases where

Re: [talk-au] Bicycle access tags in Victoria and other edits edits

2022-05-15 Thread forster
Hi all I was hoping that Sebastian would post to this list but so far, no. The following may still be disputed by Sebastian. 120963296 what is the information source? 120621671 changes as no signs present but signage exists 120382941 MacRobertson bridge approach - changes as no signs present