Hi all
I flagged the list of changes below that Sebastian may still dispute,
mostly I have reverted his changes without reaching an agreement.
Changeset 120382941 MacRobertson bridge is definitely disputed by him.
Can I add changeset/120498123, it is early days on this one and
Sebastian
Hi Highrouleur,
Re Changeset 120382605, I am not comfortable that this is not a shared
path. This route is used by many families and sports people using the route
to get to a number of sporting grounds and is called "Survey Paddock
Trail" rather than a path - The signage clearly shows that it
Hi Kim
Can I please clarify "using highway=cycleway should only be used where
there are signs allowing"?
Does this apply to just sidewalks (US sidewalk, UK pavement, AU
footpath) or all paths including paths through parkland, beside
freeways, rivers and railway lines?
Thanks
Tony
Good morning.
This change to all localities in Australia has been executed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121025161
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121025214
If you have any concerns or questions, please don't hesitate to get in
touch.
Dian
On 2022-05-09 14:11, Dian
Responses below.
On 15/5/22 13:56, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Hi Sebastian and list
Today I did a number of edits relating to whether a lack of bicycle
signage, on its own, is sufficient grounds to remove
bicycle=yes/designated or cycleway. Most of my edits though relate to
cases where
Hi all
I was hoping that Sebastian would post to this list but so far, no.
The following may still be disputed by Sebastian.
120963296 what is the information source?
120621671 changes as no signs present but signage exists
120382941 MacRobertson bridge approach - changes as no signs present
6 matches
Mail list logo
