It is both frustrating and disappointing to see that you continue to argue your
point of view that is incorrect.
It is clear that a local council who follows the Victorian road laws has
published the permissions of ways within their jurisdiction yet you still try
to argue that ways are incorrec
Hi
There are ~260 of closed ways with the tag 'building:levels=elevator'.
This tag should have numbers as the value not text, the number being the
number of levels.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels.
These object all are associated with railway stations around Sydn
Hi Warin,
Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its probably
worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator. That seems
to be a more appropriate tagging.
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, 23 October 2
Hi Sebastian
It is both frustrating and disappointing to see that you continue to
argue your point of view that is incorrect.
It is clear that a local council who follows the Victorian road laws
has published the permissions of ways within their jurisdiction yet
you still try to argue th
On 23/10/22 21:46, Phil Wyatt wrote:
Hi Warin,
Both of those examples were previously build:part=elevator. Its probably
worth asking why they changed them to building:levels=elevator. That seems
to be a more appropriate tagging.
building:part should be a 'part' of a building .. not the enti
Hi Warin,
Apologies for not getting back to you and acting on this.
We will revisit all these locations and update in the coming days.
Below is how we plan to tag the two typical scenarios:
*inside a building *
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993829900
highway=elevator
building:l
Many thanks Sigurjon
I don’t suppose you have accessibility data as well? That would be great to
know as well.
* wheelchair=yes/no – suitable for wheelchairs?
* tactile_writing:braille:lg=yes/no?
Cheers - Phil
From: Sigurjón Gísli Rúnarsson
Sent: Monday, 24 October 2022
7 matches
Mail list logo
