It is both frustrating and disappointing to see that you continue to argue your point of view that is incorrect. It is clear that a local council who follows the Victorian road laws has published the permissions of ways within their jurisdiction yet you still try to argue that ways are incorrectly tagged.
To the point I made in the previous thread, cycling is not permitted on any way unless specifically signed. This is exemplified in change set 127561873 where the permissions that Frankston council have established in line with our road rules. Regardless of copyright, I have personally verified all roads in the Seaford wetlands via both foot and bike and tagged ways according to what is on the ground and which is back to back with Frankston council (as per Victorian law) yet you still cannot provide any evidence that my tagging is incorrect. > On 23 Oct 2022, at 10:06 am, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Hi Sebastian > > You sent me private message, 15/10/22 20:52:39 EST > In it you agreed that consensus had been achieved even though you thought it > was wrong. > > I was disappointed to then see further tagging changes which in my opinion go > against community consensus. > > Changeset: 127828054 > 172362952, v4 cycleway changed to footway > 170529137, v5 cycleway changed to footway > > Changeset: 127827849 > 995759320, v2 cycleway changed to footway > 995753641, v3 cycleway changed to footway > > Changeset: 127561873 > 15 Oct 9:28am (UTC?), I think this is after your mail to me. > It lists source: > https://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/files/assets/public/things-to-do/parks-and-reserves/pdfs/seaford_wetlands_reserve_2018.pdf > This source may not be allowed because of copyright > 1024370763, v2 bicycle=yes, foot=yes changed to bicycle=no foot=no > a highway=footway with foot=no makes little sense, if you are correct then > its just an informal path with access=no? > 827522368, v7 bicycle=yes changed to bicycle=no > Seaford Wetlands Trail (770944899) bicycle =yes changed to bicycle=no > > Maybe I have misunderstood but it seems to me that you continue to act > against community consensus though you agree that consensus had been > achieved. Your thoughts please. > > Thanks > Tony > > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
