Re: [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base

2023-03-06 Thread Andrew Harvey
I hope this passes your legal Rob. My takeaway is that your implementation shouldn't rely on the OSMF's APIs or data downloads being available, so your operations and use of OSM data would not be impacted if these services weren't available or were returning unexpected responses. On Tue, 7 Mar 202

Re: [talk-au] Adoption of OSM geometry as state mapping base

2023-03-06 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Hi Rob Response received from Legal: " The OSM Terms of Use do not impose any addition restrictions on the use of the OpenStreetMap geodatabase beyond the terms of ODbL. We do prohibit the emergencies services and anything similarly time-sensitive from using OSM Services directly because OSM does

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridle Track

2023-03-06 Thread cleary
I have previously suggested in several posts that we should not rely on the NSW Base Map if there is another source of information, primarily because outdated information is often not updated in the Base Map. However, in this instance, I think the Base Map shows the correct name. When OSM was

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridle Track

2023-03-06 Thread Warin
On 6/3/23 20:59, Mark Pulley wrote: One question I forgot to ask yesterday - what do I call the track? When I did my original survey in 2009, I called it ‘Bridle Track’. At some stage it was changed to “The Bridle Track” as that is the name used on the DCS NSW Base Map. All the road name si

Re: [talk-au] NSW Bridle Track

2023-03-06 Thread Mark Pulley
One question I forgot to ask yesterday - what do I call the track? When I did my original survey in 2009, I called it ‘Bridle Track’. At some stage it was changed to “The Bridle Track” as that is the name used on the DCS NSW Base Map. All the road name signs I saw on this trip have “Bridle Trac