I think including a "slash" character in a name tag is really ugly. That's
not the way that the GNB record them. Unless someone can find some
information on the ground that records it that way?
I understand the desire to not diminish either name when they are dual
named, but I think it's wrong t
I agree that in places where a joint name is in use, that should be
documented as `name=Booraghee / Bradleys Head`as. From a data perspective,
I think it is also useful to know that the english called it (in english
spelling) `name:en=Bradleys Head` and the locals called it (in local
romanised spel
This may depend on the specific place but in many places I believe Phil’s
interpretation is correct and Andrew’s is inappropriate. Many places and
reserves now have joint management or co-ownership, and dual/joint names. Joint
names are not alternative names. John Roberts-Smith is John Roberts-S
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 08:11, Tom Brennan wrote:
> There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are
> getting dual (aboriginal) naming.
>
> For example:
> - Booraghee / Bradleys Head
> - Cooyoyo / The Castle
> - Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh
>
> From the point of view of the Geogra
Hi Folks,
In Tasmania I have started to use the following for dual named locations
name=kunanyi / Mount Wellington
name:en=Mount Wellington
name:xtz=kunanyi
where xtz is the language code for the indigenous language of the area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/A
I'm struggling to word this reply without being labelled racist or
discriminatory, but I believe the
English names should remain and the "alt_name" field be used for local names.
Anything else will render OSM data unusable to the majority of people in this
country.
Ian
On 6/6/23 8:06 am, Tom Br
There are an increasing number of places/features in NSW that are
getting dual (aboriginal) naming.
For example:
- Booraghee / Bradleys Head
- Cooyoyo / The Castle
- Fort Denison / Muddawahnyuh
From the point of view of the Geographic Names Board, there doesn't
appear to be any primacy given t
Sounds good.
I'm inclined to go with (1), but (2) could presumably work with a relation?
cheers
Tom
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 5/06/2023 8:47 am, Little Maps wrote:
I don’t know if there’s a “correct” method as at least 3 d
8 matches
Mail list logo