Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

2023-10-22 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
I didn't so much mean the heat trace, as the actual line on the map itself which is no longer shown for those "disused" paths. Thanks Graeme On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 17:03, wrote: > Hi Graeme > I have not seen anything indicating Strava removes ways from heat > maps. Way 1033069444 was removed

Re: [talk-au] How to efficiently improve AU address coverage?

2023-10-22 Thread Yuchen Pei
On Thu 2023-10-19 21:47:28 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I found the process was only using Vicmap data from last year, so I've > updated that. The URL it's using should be serving new data every week but > I'm not sure it was not happening previously. This is the URL

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

2023-10-22 Thread forster
Hi Graeme I have not seen anything indicating Strava removes ways from heat maps. Way 1033069444 was removed by lifecycle prefix on 1 September. Its heat trace is still there. I expect it to fade as it is used less and finally disappear. Tony

Re: [talk-au] Deletion of informal paths by NSW NPWS

2023-10-22 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Made this, slightly tongue in cheek, comment t'other week. Turns out that they possibly do! Just clearing a Note & noticed that the traces of these paths, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=3942697#map=18/-32.95437/151.74519 which are tagged as disused, don't appear in Strava!