I agree, indeed some are already mapped this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7032873
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 15:20, cleary wrote:
>
> This was discussed about a decade ago in regard to unincorporated areas in
> NSW and SA. The prevailing view was that unincorporated areas are local
>
This was discussed about a decade ago in regard to unincorporated areas in NSW
and SA. The prevailing view was that unincorporated areas are local government
areas. They usually have a different administrative structure (as distinct from
the councils that administer local government in more p
I'm sure it is done, as I've seen it at a smaller scale in the USA, I'll say
tagging in OSM in USA isn't done for what in USA we call "special districts."
And these most specifically do NOT get tagged with any admin_level value (6 or
otherwise) because they really aren't a government, what admi
Thanks stevea for the considered reply. Much appreciated.
In Australia (and specifically Victoria from my experience), unincorporated
areas are not "surrounded by" a local government area implying the local
government overlays them, though they do sometimes abut one or more
neighbouring local gove
I absolutely realize that my experience is with the USA and not Australia, but
(in a VERY broad-brush way) the logical mappings between how federal=2, state=4
and admin_level=6 is almost always the "sub-state / local-ish" government
authorities (in the USA it is almost always what we call a "cou
Hi all, just seeing if there's consensus on what administration level
unincorporated areas should have in Australia?
In Victoria (and potentially other states), the unincorporated areas are
administered by state-level statutory authorities and departments, so I'm
thinking admin_level=6 to match eq
6 matches
Mail list logo
