Considering there's also a "hanger" there that doesn't seem to be
visible on any aerial imagery I just checked, I'm in favour of deleting
it. It just doesn't seem to actually exist, and I question where the
name came from.
---
Thanks,
Andrew Welch
m...@andrewwelch.net
On 29/04/2024 5:34 pm,
Hi Bryce,
Of those datasets, the City of Adelaide one appears to be the only one
containing house numbers with some kind of geographical reference, so
it's got some potential for an import if someone has the time to go
through it.
The roads dataset doesn't include house numbers, and the
While the original was closed, a new (and identical) post has been made in
the forums:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edit-proposal-south-australias-road-network/110095
Thanks,
Andrew Welch
m...@andrewwelch.net
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
It's only occurring again because he's been told that changing roads to
DataSA classifications will result in further blocks.
And yeah, as Daniel has said, this is a pointless edit that offers no real
improvements, and realistically seems like an attempt for one mapper to
continue mapping the way
I have to disagree with the first part of that. OSM is designed as
somewhere where you can map pretty much anything that exists, as long as it
can be verified. Part of the reason why we want them to map the way we map
is because it shows clearly that while there is a path there, it is
informal (so
ave edit wars.
> >
> > And to repeat, OSM has no control over who renders what downstream.
> Please
> > respect a land managers decision, or at least ask about it respectfully
> and
> > wait as long as is needed for a response. They're busy..managing land.
> >
&g
Frederik basically covers what I was trying to say, the edits go against
how we map in OSM, and repeated attempts to work with them just haven't
worked yet. OSM does not belong to NPWS, they can't just go deleting things
like it's their own GIS system.
If they have better things to do, then they
wrote:
> I've yet had no response back from Stephen Stenberg re Slate Falls
> Lookout, after I basically repeated what you all had already said to him :-(
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 10:51, Andrew Welch via Talk-au <
> talk-au@openstreetma
The user who's edits were revered by Frederik has now tagged those ways as
access=no, hopefully that means the message is starting to get across to
NPWS.
They did set some questionable names on those trails though, and haven't
replied to a changeset comment asking about those.
Thanks,
Andrew
I think it might also be important to state that OSM is a database, so if
consumers aren’t rendering tracks properly if tagged as such, the issue is
with them not us, and that what they are doing can be considered as
vandalism by mappers. We have ways to reflect the current state, and ensure
that
Bottom of the Speed Zones page has a link to CC-BY 4.0, so it’s okay only
if we have a waiver for not being able to directly attribute them. There’s
one for DataSA on the wiki as an example.
Thanks,
Andrew Welch
m...@andrewwelch.net
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 9:01 pm, Mark Pulley wrote:
> Does the
Hi all,
I'd like to propose an automated edit to remove a misleading note
previously mass added to all ways tagged highway=trunk in South Australia.
There is a forum post for any discussion/feedback at
12 matches
Mail list logo
