Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

It is both frustrating and disappointing to see that you continue to argue your point of view that is incorrect. It is clear that a local council who follows the Victorian road laws has published the permissions of ways within their jurisdiction yet you still try to argue that ways are

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

unclear legality on even well used paths. > > I don’t think going around adding a specific bicycle permissions to every > footway is particularly productive. A routing service could easily make this > a non-issue by offering an “ignore sidewalk” button. > > Dian > >> O

Re: [talk-au] Cycle permissions by a user

An interesting post by aharvey in that thread. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/use-of-bicycle-designated-vs-bicycle-yes-outside-of-germany/3230/38 regards, Sebastian > On 9 Oct 2022, at 9:19 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >  > To open another can of worms, just spotted this linked

Re: [talk-au] Mapping shared driveways

t;> private residential roads. >> >> But they could all do with a clean up, one way or the other! >> >> cheers >> Tom >> >> Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning >> Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com >> >> On 15/03/2

[talk-au] Mapping shared driveways

Hi all, Had a query regarding the mapping of driveways / shared driveways as there seems to be quite a number of different approaches in the data. Below are three examples of similar ways that have different tags used in each instance. Highway=service Service= driveway

[talk-au] Cycling on Victorian paths

Hi there, I’m starting a new thread in relation to recent discussion regarding access on footpaths which have bicycle=No In the Melbourne Bikepath cycling community there has been vigorous discussion relating to the strict rules the cyclists must follow and not ride on footpaths due to