Thanks cleary
I now see that it is easier to maintain boundary layer segments that are not
superimposed over each other. I too am finding that the overlain boundaries are
problematic.
> On 26 Mar 2016, at 11:20 AM, cleary wrote:
>
>
> Nev
>
> I have added some of those boundaries. Where the
Nev
I have added some of those boundaries. Where the administrative boundary
and the national park boundary share exactly the same way, I have used
that single way and included it in two separate relations, one for the
administrative area and the other for the national park. If the admin
boundar
There have been many new admin_level=10 administrative boundaries added in NSW
recently.
Are we expected to split and use these as shared sections for the sides of
national park multipolygons, etc.
Or is it preferable to leave the admin_level=10 (and other admin levels) alone
and separate.
I
3 matches
Mail list logo
