hink it'll take some time refining the framework as incidents occur.
Jeff.
From: John Smith
To: Elizabeth Dodd
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, 3 September, 2009 8:23:46 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Brainstorming: Simple Revert-Tools
2009/9/3
Warning this is a bit of a rant,
I think the tools for reverting a change-set need to be greatly
improved/exist.
I recently had something that I consider non-intentional vandalism (large
number of nodes deleted, apparently anything less than 2.5 metres accuracy is
not required, according to so
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Smith wrote:
> I'm not disagreeing, I'm just trying to flesh out a policy on what to do :)
i reckon that the two noisiest persons on this list should give others a
chance next :-)
--
BOFH excuse #142:
new guy cross-connected phone lines with ac power bus.
2009/9/3 Elizabeth Dodd :
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Smith wrote:
>> That's the general case of mistakes, not intentional vandalism, and
>> it's vandalism that started this thread on the talk list.
>>
>> Assume they don't reply, what then?
> how long is "don't reply" is the next question
>
> then i
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Smith wrote:
> That's the general case of mistakes, not intentional vandalism, and
> it's vandalism that started this thread on the talk list.
>
> Assume they don't reply, what then?
how long is "don't reply" is the next question
then i'd suggest notify to talk-au
and exp
2009/9/3 Elizabeth Dodd :
> makes sense to sort out a policy now
> currently if i see something which may be a problem i identify the mapper,
> message them through OSM and hopefully have a discussion
> i try to be open in this communication, not starting with accusations etc
> because i want to op
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, John Smith wrote:
> 2009/9/3 Liz :
> > I'd think that when we hit by vandalism in AU we would be talking on the
> > local list and making a decision on reverting changes.
> > I would think that a "higher status" mapper would be actually permitted
> > to make the changes rather t
2009/9/3 Liz :
> I'd think that when we hit by vandalism in AU we would be talking on the local
> list and making a decision on reverting changes.
> I would think that a "higher status" mapper would be actually permitted to
> make the changes rather than anyone.
I've actually been pondering about
8 matches
Mail list logo
