Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

After brief discussion on legal-talk, I have sent an email to the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet requesting explicit permission for OSM to use the PSMA Administrative Boundaries and I included concerns raised within legal-talk. I have had an informal phone call which acknowledged

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

If you are going to bring in any more administrative boundaries can we please do them as a formal import. If there was one thing that I learnt from the experience of doing the NSW ones is that bringing them in manually is a massive PITA. On 26/06/16 10:11, cleary wrote: Thanks to Simon and

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

On 6/27/2016 10:00 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: On 26 June 2016 at 13:36, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: But I already am dragging the chain in a few areas .. post offices and libraries from the LPI for instance. Then there is camp sites, tourist information offices.. In my opinion be

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

On 26 June 2016 at 10:11, cleary wrote: > > Thanks to Simon and Andrew for your responses which I now understand. Can I > now follow-on and request clarification about other data from data.gov.au - > for example the sources listed in the wiki for Queensland Local Government > Areas

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

On 26 June 2016 at 13:36, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >But I already am dragging the chain > in a few areas .. post offices and libraries from the LPI for instance. Then > there is camp sites, tourist information offices.. In my opinion be careful with that as some of that data is either

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

On 6/26/2016 10:11 AM, cleary wrote: Thanks to Simon and Andrew for your responses which I now understand. Can I now follow-on and request clarification about other data from data.gov.au - for example the sources listed in the wiki for Queensland Local Government Areas and QLD Suburb/Locality

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

Thanks to Simon and Andrew for your responses which I now understand. Can I now follow-on and request clarification about other data from data.gov.au - for example the sources listed in the wiki for Queensland Local Government Areas and QLD Suburb/Locality Boundaries which are CC-BY- 4.0 but do

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

The simple answer is "NO", the G-NAF data is published under a non-open custom licence and currently can not be used directly in OSM. Every communication we've had with the relevant authorities has indicated that they are at this time not moving away from the non-open licence. This may change in

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

Hmmm, If I just delivered mail to particular addresses (as I did to 150 today, have a list of addresses) does that mean that these addresses are now able to be imported from the GNAF? Maybe I need to tag them as note:letterbox verified or note:GNAF import ok? I’m not being flippant, and I

Re: [talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

On 25 June 2016 at 13:35, cleary wrote: > I'm sorry that I'm slow in picking up an old thread from about six months > ago but I remain uncertain about the implications. > > As I understand the situation, the licence that accompanies the GNAF > (address) data from data.gov.au is not

[talk-au] GNAF (address) data re-visited

I'm sorry that I'm slow in picking up an old thread from about six months ago but I remain uncertain about the implications. As I understand the situation, the licence that accompanies the GNAF (address) data from data.gov.au is not itself adequate for OSM. However the data it is covered by the