On 5 July 2010 08:50, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
3) use two separate relations (one amenity=school and one
amenity=place_of_worship) that both have the building as the sole
member. John might have further thoughts on this [IMHO very hacky] use
of relations.
Normally I might
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, No - I don't like the idea of using separate/duplicate features
(e.g. an extra node) to describe something at the same physical
location.
... So right now, I see four remaining options, IMHO all pretty crappy and
On 5 July 2010 17:39, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The only reason you gave against creating multiple nodes was you
didn't like it. Seems fine to me. Especially since the church and
school in this case are not really co-located: the centre of the
There is no church, they're using a
Quoting John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2010 17:39, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The only reason you gave against creating multiple nodes was you
didn't like it. Seems fine to me. Especially since the church and
school in this case are not really co-located: the
On 05/07/10 17:49, John Smith wrote:
There is no church, they're using a school hall for church based activities...
church is a significant amenity provided by that building, surely. It
is, by all accounts, a place of worship.
John H
___
On 5 July 2010 18:52, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
Depends on the definition of church. If you mean 'building with pointy roof'
then no (although some church buildings don't have pointy roofs). If you
mean the congregation then yes. Depends on what the map is being used for -
if
On 5 July 2010 19:09, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 05/07/10 17:49, John Smith wrote:
There is no church, they're using a school hall for church based
activities...
church is a significant amenity provided by that building, surely. It is,
by all accounts, a place of worship.
At
On 05/07/10 19:19, John Smith wrote:
At most the church (as an organisation) makes use of a location,
what's on the ground is a school facility that may have many such
uses...
Like a Post Office building also acting as a weather-monitoring station,
for example? Just tag the Post Office?
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:18 PM, John Smith
If we're tagging what's on the ground,
Which we're not. There is no on the ground rule, guideline, axiom,
suggestion or anything. Can we stop using this non-existent guiding
principle?
then it's a school hall, if you
want to do minor uses this would
On 5 July 2010 20:06, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Which we're not. There is no on the ground rule, guideline, axiom,
suggestion or anything. Can we stop using this non-existent guiding
principle?
Ok, if we're not tagging physical objects what are we tagging? The
gold brick road to
On 5 July 2010 17:39, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The only reason you gave against creating multiple nodes was you
didn't like it. Seems fine to me. Especially since the church and
school in this case are not really co-located: the centre of the
There is no church, they're using
On 5 July 2010 20:21, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Interesting as the church as a building is a corruption of the original
meaning
I did try to make this point clear by stating organisation v building,
however it's a little difficult to geographically map organisations,
so all we're left with is
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 17:39 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, No - I don't like the idea of using separate/duplicate features
(e.g. an extra node) to describe something at the same physical
location.
... So right now,
On 6 July 2010 02:08, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
What about.. draw the school as an area/building, then simply put a
single node for place_of_worship in the hall, maybe with opening_hours
or something similar.
So if there is 10 uses/users of the hall, we need to place 10 nodes?
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
I'm planning to add a local church, but rather than having its own building,
it meets in a local primary school hall. What would be the best way to tag
this?
Should I place a node as usual over the building
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 02:21 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 6 July 2010 02:08, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
What about.. draw the school as an area/building, then simply put a
single node for place_of_worship in the hall, maybe with opening_hours
or something similar.
So if
Hi.
Why map any POI at all? I don't map everything - I choose what I think is
significant.
If you think it is significant that a particular church meets at a
particular place, I think add a node. Same for cub scouts.
Personally I'm not going to bother mapping where Scouts meet, but I
appreciate
I'm planning to add a local church, but rather than having its own
building, it meets in a local primary school hall. What would be the
best way to tag this?
Should I place a node as usual over the building (place_of_worship=
(etc)) with a note that it meets in the school hall? Is there a
On 4 July 2010 23:33, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
I'm planning to add a local church, but rather than having its own building,
it meets in a local primary school hall. What would be the best way to tag
this?
It's not really a church if it's a school hall, the church
(organisation)
I'm assuming that it meets in that location permanently (as in, it's regular
meetings are always at that location).
Here I have just put an extra amenity=place_of_worship node at the school.
- Ben.
On 4 July 2010 23:49, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not really a church if
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
Should I place a node as usual over the building (place_of_worship= (etc))
with a note that it meets in the school hall?
IMHO, No - I don't like the idea of using separate/duplicate features
(e.g. an extra node) to
21 matches
Mail list logo
