[talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread John Henderson
highway=ford is not rendering on Mapnik, eg: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-35.50894lon=149.67154zoom=17layers=M I believe it should. I have no idea who to raise this issue with, or how. Before I spend more time looking, does somebody happen to know? John H

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread John Henderson
On 02/09/11 10:16, Ian Sergeant wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure mapnik doesn't render highway=ford on a way. It is probably for the best that it doesn't, IMO. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7510#p7510 and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stylesheet for information on what

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread Ian Sergeant
Hi, I'm pretty sure mapnik doesn't render highway=ford on a way. It is probably for the best that it doesn't, IMO. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=7510#p7510 and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stylesheet for information on what is included in the stylesheets. And

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread Mark Pulley
Quoting John Henderson snow...@gmx.com: highway=ford is not rendering on Mapnik, eg: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-35.50894lon=149.67154zoom=17layers=M I believe it should. I have no idea who to raise this issue with, or how. Before I spend more time looking, does somebody happen to

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread Ian Sergeant
On 2 September 2011 11:26, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote: On 02/09/11 10:16, Ian Sergeant wrote: Hi, I'm pretty sure mapnik doesn't render highway=ford on a way. It is probably for the best that it doesn't, IMO. See

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering

2011-09-01 Thread John Henderson
On 02/09/11 12:44, Ian Sergeant wrote: So, if I were you, I would either use highway=ford on a node, rather than a way, or use highway=unclassified, ford=yes. Thanks. I'll put it back to that again. John H ___ Talk-au mailing list

[talk-au] Mapnik rendering of AU cities

2008-12-04 Thread Roy Rankin
With the discussion of places, I noticed that on the slippy map with the mapnik renderer, only the names of Sydney and Canberra appear on the 500km and 200km scales. I have looked at the tags for the Sydney, Canberra and Melbourne nodes; and I do not understand why Melbourne is not shown as I

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering of AU cities

2008-12-04 Thread Matt White
Roy Rankin wrote: With the discussion of places, I noticed that on the slippy map with the mapnik renderer, only the names of Sydney and Canberra appear on the 500km and 200km scales. Does anyone understand why Melbourne is not shown on the whole of Australia view? Probably cos it's

Re: [talk-au] Mapnik rendering of AU cities

2008-12-04 Thread Stephen Hope
I'm not positive, but I think that the very low zoom views don't actually get a lot (any?) of their data from the live OSM data. Rather they do, but they are only updated on very occasionally. There is just too much data to be continually recreating tiles that large from the main database. The