Ok,
I have done the ones in Sydney + Newcastle-
brought the Stand information to the front of the name, I have left the
rest of the information alone.
I'll make a note in the OSM Aust guidelines about it.
I'll have a look at other capitols later.
On 24/01/19 14:40, Warin wrote:
The ref numbe
The ref number is included in the GTFS data which has been applied for in April
(last year).
https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/timetables-complete-gtfs (GTFS
'stop_id' I think is OSMs 'ref')
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue
As there is an election comi
In Sydney, many stops display the stop number but I'm not sure if we have
another source for this data - in NSW, the convention is that the first four
numbers are the postcode of the suburb. So all stops in Strathfield would have
a 6 or 7 digit number with the first four digits being the postco
On 22/01/19 12:20, Warin wrote:
On 22/01/19 12:03, Sam Wilson wrote:
On 1/21/19 4:58 PM, Warin wrote:
I have used (misused?) the ref to tag the routes that use that bus
stop, then some one has put the stop 'number' in as local_ref.
Possibly the stop number is a 'operator_ref' ... whatever, no
On 22/01/19 12:03, Sam Wilson wrote:
On 1/21/19 4:58 PM, Warin wrote:
I have used (misused?) the ref to tag the routes that use that bus
stop, then some one has put the stop 'number' in as local_ref.
Possibly the stop number is a 'operator_ref' ... whatever, no
practical use to the normal perso
On 1/21/19 4:58 PM, Warin wrote:
I have used (misused?) the ref to tag the routes that use that bus stop,
then some one has put the stop 'number' in as local_ref.
Possibly the stop number is a 'operator_ref' ... whatever, no practical
use to the normal person.
I actually find the ref super use
Yes, I have seen the ref tag used for some number that occurs on the bus
stop.
I have used (misused?) the ref to tag the routes that use that bus stop,
then some one has put the stop 'number' in as local_ref.
Possibly the stop number is a 'operator_ref' ... whatever, no practical
use to the norm
Why not:
name=Stand F, Strathfield Station
addr:street=Albert Road
On 22/1/19 11:26 am, Michael Collinson wrote:
> In Sweden, I have seen the "F" going into the ref tag. Just a thought, I
> don't recall how it affects rendering in common schemes. Con: Clash with
> a more rigorous ref num giving b
I agree, putting the stand name first makes sense.
I've been putting ref=1234 tags on stands (with their ID from the sign),
but for some reason haven't ever thought to add the name as well; I
shall do so from now on.
On 1/21/19 4:26 PM, Michael Collinson wrote:
In Sweden, I have seen the "F"
In Sweden, I have seen the "F" going into the ref tag. Just a thought, I
don't recall how it affects rendering in common schemes. Con: Clash with
a more rigorous ref num giving by the transport authority, "40459" or
such. Another (complementary) practice is to put just "F" as the name -
which h
Are there anydissenters?
I'll give it a week.
Any feed back from other places In Australia?
On 21/01/19 20:00, cleary wrote:
As a regular user of public transport, I agree.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Warin wrote:
Hi,
At present the names of bus stops goes something like
name=Stra
As a regular user of public transport, I agree.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 4:39 PM, Warin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> At present the names of bus stops goes something like
>
> name=Strathfield Station, Albert Rd (Stand F).
>
>
> The web transport trip planers direct you to Stand F, yet this is not
>
Hi,
At present the names of bus stops goes something like
name=Strathfield Station, Albert Rd (Stand F).
The web transport trip planers direct you to Stand F, yet this is not
very visiblein OSM renderings as that information is last.
Would it not be best to have the name put the more deta
13 matches
Mail list logo
