On 17 July 2010 13:02, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I've also been finding the opposite. It's almost impossible to follow
> a signposted walking track from Nearmap. Even when you have a fair
> idea where the track goes, there are all kinds of red herrings that
> look just as visible from the air. Not t
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> > That said, having had a look at the new coverage in the Hunter Valley, there
> > is a huge amount of detail you can get from Nearmap that would be
> > practically impossible with surve
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Ben Kelley wrote:
> That said, having had a look at the new coverage in the Hunter Valley, there
> is a huge amount of detail you can get from Nearmap that would be
> practically impossible with surveying.
I've also been finding the opposite. It's almost impossibl
On 16 July 2010 20:31, Ben Last wrote:
> If you want to make requests, http://forum.Nearmap.com/ :)
I did some time ago :)
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
If you want to make requests, http://forum.Nearmap.com/ :)
Cheers
b
On Friday, July 16, 2010, Babstar wrote:
> While we're on the requests, please an an extension from Mittagong west south
> west to cover Bowral, Moss Vale, Exeter & Bundanoon as well as the Hume
> Highway. Population approxima
On 16 July 2010 16:29, Ben Kelley wrote:
> While Nearmap for Tamworth and Armidale would be nice, surveyors have been
> hard at work in both.
Aerial imagery can do things like landuse, not just roads, which is a
lot harder to get or even see from ground level...
_
> On 16 July 2010 15:35, Babstar wrote:
> > While we're on the requests, please an an extension from Mittagong west
>
> If we're on to requests :)
How about some more of North Qld.
I notice Mackay and Cairns are on the plan but what about areas in between,
(Whitsunday's, Bowen, Townsville).
While Nearmap for Tamworth and Armidale would be nice, surveyors have been
hard at work in both.
That said, having had a look at the new coverage in the Hunter Valley, there
is a huge amount of detail you can get from Nearmap that would be
practically impossible with surveying.
- Ben.
On 16 Jul
No worries! The new coverage they have set out for Victoria including
the Mornington Peninsula, Phillip Island, Ballarat and the Yarra
Valley is great news for me! All they need to plan to fly now is
Pakenham then i'll be happy! Oh wait, then the Latrobe Valley,
then you all get the idea!
On 1
On 16 July 2010 15:35, Babstar wrote:
> While we're on the requests, please an an extension from Mittagong west
If we're on to requests :)
I'd still like Tamworth, NSW the area has 55k+ people according to
wikipedia, and Armidale, NSW isn't far away with another 20k+
people...
There is also Dub
I'd like a bit more.. Tasmania has NONE :(
Neal
On 16/07/10 2:48 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I just wish the area between Ballarat and Bendigo extended a bit
further west. It's a very interesting area of Victoria, full of little
dirt tracks through the old gold digging area. Creswick is half
cover
While we're on the requests, please an an extension from Mittagong west
south west to cover Bowral, Moss Vale, Exeter & Bundanoon as well as the
Hume Highway. Population approximately 42,000 in this district and a
significant number would be covered in this narrow sweep.
--
Babstar
__
I just wish the area between Ballarat and Bendigo extended a bit
further west. It's a very interesting area of Victoria, full of little
dirt tracks through the old gold digging area. Creswick is half
covered, Clunes is off the map...
But to be honest, no matter how much coverage there was, we'd al
...which we're going to keep updated...
Cheers
b
On 16 July 2010 10:08, John Smith wrote:
> Thanks to Lakeyboy for pointing out Nearmap planned coverage areas PDF:
>
> http://www.nearmap.com/assets/pdf/coverage/NearMap-PhotoMap-Coverage.pdf
>
> ___
> T
Thanks to Lakeyboy for pointing out Nearmap planned coverage areas PDF:
http://www.nearmap.com/assets/pdf/coverage/NearMap-PhotoMap-Coverage.pdf
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Ben Last wrote:
> Our general principle is "we try not to overpromise so we can be sure to
> deliver" :) So it's less a question of keeping things close to our chest
> than it is of keeping the flexibility to fly/process/publish surveys in
> whatever order makes m
>
> On 3 May 2010 22:46, Luke Woolley wrote:
>
> I'm quite interested to know what areas NearMap are keen on flying next (I
> > should say we all are!)
>
> Our general principle is "we try not to overpromise so we can be sure to
deliver" :) So it's less a question of keeping things close to our c
On 3 May 2010 22:46, Luke Woolley wrote:
> I am pretty sure they have not flown Ballarat yet. I haven't seen any forum
I could have sworn I saw them announce Ballarat on their forum, but I
can't find it so I'll remove it...
> posts or twitter updates about Ballarat, but it would be nice since th
I am pretty sure they have not flown Ballarat yet. I haven't seen any forum
posts or twitter updates about Ballarat, but it would be nice since the Bacchus
Marsh area imagery (which unfortunately is quite cloudy in places) misses
Ballarat by about 10km. I've been keeping track and updating the w
On 3 May 2010 18:28, John Kitchener wrote:
>>Then they just need a few other capitals (Darwin, Hobart), missing
>>sections of current cities (Ipswich, west of Brisbane) and regional
>>centres (Dubbo, Tamworth, Toowoomba etc) and that would cover the
>>majority of the population...
>
> Great work …
>Then they just need a few other capitals (Darwin, Hobart), missing
>sections of current cities (Ipswich, west of Brisbane) and regional
>centres (Dubbo, Tamworth, Toowoomba etc) and that would cover the
>majority of the population...
Great work . then the Central Coast and Newcastle wud be
On 3 May 2010 14:45, Peter Ross wrote:
> I did the percentages because the raw numbers really didn't mean
> anything to me. Only took 5 minutes to google sizes and use
> calculator to give percentages.
Which is more or less my reasoning, I kept seeing total area covered
by all the Nearmap flight
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:49 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 3 May 2010 08:23, Peter Ross wrote:
>> Which is 1.5% of australias total surface area (7 692 024km^2) with
>> victoria leading the way with 20% of the state having aerial coverage
>> (237,629km^2). I think it's somewhat less as the melbourne
On 3 May 2010 08:23, Peter Ross wrote:
> Which is 1.5% of australias total surface area (7 692 024km^2) with
The Nearmap polygons extend into the ocean, although I wonder how
accurate the surface area total is and if they included bays and
such...
___
On 3 May 2010 08:23, Peter Ross wrote:
> Which is 1.5% of australias total surface area (7 692 024km^2) with
> victoria leading the way with 20% of the state having aerial coverage
> (237,629km^2). I think it's somewhat less as the melbourne coverage
> extends into NSW, but even so it's very impr
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:03 AM, John Smith wrote:
> I was curious how much actual coverage Nearmap currently has, and
> since we have boundaries for Nearmap coverage I thought I'd make use
> of them. I rounded the area to 2dp, but here is the result...
>
> Sydney = 9054.79km^2
> Carnarvon = 2352.2
I was curious how much actual coverage Nearmap currently has, and
since we have boundaries for Nearmap coverage I thought I'd make use
of them. I rounded the area to 2dp, but here is the result...
Sydney = 9054.79km^2
Carnarvon = 2352.25km^2
Perth = 32454.66km^2
Rottness = 34.49km^2
Adelaide = 102
27 matches
Mail list logo
