On 18/07/2016 14:13, Warren wrote:
I am reasonably local. Both areas have had recent road building. But
I think they are now complete. I will divert when I am close and
resort to a gps trace.
Excellent stuff - thanks.
Best Regards,
Andy
___
T
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:31:45 +0100
From: Andy Townsend
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Possible illegal imports in Western Australia
Message-ID: <578bdd21.3020...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
For info, I&
On 7/18/2016 5:31 AM, Andy Townsend wrote:
For info, I've just finishing reverting the remaining nodes from these
imports. The last one was
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40792543 . As previously
mentioned upthread, many of the objects had already been removed but
some of the nodes
For info, I've just finishing reverting the remaining nodes from these
imports. The last one was
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40792543 . As previously
mentioned upthread, many of the objects had already been removed but
some of the nodes from some of the larger changesets remained.
I notice aaronsta already reverted 40195731 so I tried to revert
40195392
40195333
40195330
40195315
40171955
40066399
40065907
40065268
40064728
40064280
40053210
40052929
40052639
40052416
40052185
40051946
40051763
These ones worked 40195392 40195315 40195330 40195333 40171955
40053210 but the
I don't have the knowledge to run scripts safely, so it would be good if
you could do this. Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, at 09:34 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> On 5 Jul 2016 8:26 PM, "cleary" wrote:
> > I have been looking at some South Australian administrative
> > boundaries.
> > The
On 5 Jul 2016 8:26 PM, "cleary" wrote:
> I have been looking at some South Australian administrative boundaries.
> The South Australia / Western Australia border is a bit messy and I was
> looking to see it I could sort it out. I realised that some of the data
> is part of the recently reported i
I have been looking at some South Australian administrative boundaries.
The South Australia / Western Australia border is a bit messy and I was
looking to see it I could sort it out. I realised that some of the data
is part of the recently reported illegal imports of WA data - includes
some LGA a
Ok this should be all reverted now.
On 25 June 2016 at 09:12, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Ok, reverting the FIX SOURCES changesets in progress, it could take a while
> to finish, it's been running overnight and still going.
>
> 40207793
> 40207001
> 40206754
> 40206373
> 40206195
> 40206035
> 40205790
Hi DWG,
As per this thread on talk-au, a user was found to be importing data
without consultation of the community and data which we don't appear
to have a suitable license for.
These are their changesets for their imports before a block was
imposed on the user.
40195731
40195392
40195333
401953
On 6/25/2016 9:12 AM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Ok, reverting the FIX SOURCES changesets in progress, it could take a
while to finish, it's been running overnight and still going.
40207793
40207001
40206754
40206373
40206195
40206035
40205790
40205709
40205378
40205189
40204886
40204783
40204680
4
Ok, reverting the FIX SOURCES changesets in progress, it could take a while
to finish, it's been running overnight and still going.
40207793
40207001
40206754
40206373
40206195
40206035
40205790
40205709
40205378
40205189
40204886
40204783
40204680
40204617
40204561
40204500
40204341
40204199
4020
On 24 June 2016 at 21:02, cleary wrote:
> Yes, Seems appropriate to revert these changes.
Okay I'm taking a crack using
https://github.com/woodpeck/osm-revert-scripts.git, for changesets
40197428 to current (source deletion), best if no one else tries to
make changes to these for the time being,
Yes, Seems appropriate to revert these changes.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016, at 06:48 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On 24 June 2016 at 17:52, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Last Changeset: 40207793 looks to be removing the tag source=nearmap
>
> All their latest "FIX SOURCES" are like that and
On 24 June 2016 at 17:52, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Last Changeset: 40207793 looks to be removing the tag source=nearmap
All their latest "FIX SOURCES" are like that and these are invalid. I
mapped some of the original features from nearmap and since they
didn't actually change anythi
On 6/24/2016 11:59 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
I've just noticed that this user:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aaronsta
has been busily importing a number of Landgate data sets into OSM.
The problem is that these are licenced under these terms:
http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Documents/SLIP
I've just noticed that this user:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aaronsta
has been busily importing a number of Landgate data sets into OSM.
The problem is that these are licenced under these terms:
http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Documents/SLIPTransactionPersonalUseLicence.pdf
Which strict
17 matches
Mail list logo
