Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data

2015-02-15 Thread Henry Haselgrove
Hello, I wanted to let you know that I have adjusted my plans based on feedback from this list and from the “imports” list. Here is a summary of the changes: 1. I will tag all dams as water=reservoir instead of water=pond. Most existing dams in SA are tagged this way anyway. A dam seems

Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data

2015-01-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Secondly, is it better to do 4x imports for each feature set; starting at the most high level feature layer? I mean there are commonly things you just don't expect, so a trial run with large obvious features is probably best; pushing further into detail. Third one; why just features with names?

Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data

2015-01-20 Thread Warin
On 21/01/2015 2:00 PM, Henry Haselgrove wrote: Hi All, I have created the following wiki page to describe a plan I have to import some of the waterbodies data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/South_Australian_Waterbodies Any feedback you have about the plan would be greatly

Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data

2015-01-20 Thread Daniel O'Connor
What's the level of detail like for small bodies of water? For example, I've put in some manual effort around small dams in places like http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-35.0894/138.8376 - i'd be curious to see a preview of this sort of area with the merged data. On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:30

Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data

2015-01-20 Thread Henry Haselgrove
! Henry From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 10:33 PM To: Henry Haselgrove Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data Secondly, is it better to do 4x imports for each feature set; starting