Hello,
I wanted to let you know that I have adjusted my plans based on feedback from
this list and from the “imports” list. Here is a summary of the changes:
1. I will tag all dams as water=reservoir instead of water=pond. Most
existing dams in SA are tagged this way anyway. A dam seems
Secondly, is it better to do 4x imports for each feature set; starting at
the most high level feature layer?
I mean there are commonly things you just don't expect, so a trial run with
large obvious features is probably best; pushing further into detail.
Third one; why just features with names?
On 21/01/2015 2:00 PM, Henry Haselgrove wrote:
Hi All,
I have created the following wiki page to describe a plan I have to
import some of the waterbodies data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/South_Australian_Waterbodies
Any feedback you have about the plan would be greatly
What's the level of detail like for small bodies of water?
For example, I've put in some manual effort around small dams in places
like http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-35.0894/138.8376 - i'd be
curious to see a preview of this sort of area with the merged data.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:30
!
Henry
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 10:33 PM
To: Henry Haselgrove
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Proposed import of SA waterbodies data
Secondly, is it better to do 4x imports for each feature set; starting
5 matches
Mail list logo