I'm doing some work on the outskirts of Brisbane, where the properties
start to get bigger, doing some clean up. And I got to wondering about
residential landuse.
At one end of the scale, you have inner city housing (350-1000 sq m
lots), and there's no question they are residential. At the other,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Stephen Hope wrote:
>
> These are used only as residences
Therefore, landuse=residential. The size of the property is
irrelevant, and self-evident.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstr
Stephen,
I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
farming and are therefore still residential. In general, these sort of areas
are on the periphery of townships and are a transition into
On 17 June 2010 10:39, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
> landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
Aren't they commonly known as hobby farms if you have a few animals
for tax purposes?
___
I am sure they are called numerous things, what is the most appropriate/most
commonly recognised term in the Australian context?
A farm is an area of land that you derive the majority of your income from.
Given the drought of the last decade it could be argued that there are many
more "hobby farms"
On 17 June 2010 11:33, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> A farm is an area of land that you derive the majority of your income from.
> Given the drought of the last decade it could be argued that there are many
> more "hobby farms" across the southern states. Personally I don't like the
> term, but if it
are we mapping for tax purposes?
what is it referred to in the local government act (or planning act) of your
particular state.
not all of these properties will be classified as a hobby farm ie I may have
40 hectares but only grow a few weeds.
On 17 June 2010 11:37, John Smith wrote:
> On 17 Jun
On 17 June 2010 11:40, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> are we mapping for tax purposes?
We map what ever is verifiable, a tax purpose might be verifiable :D
> what is it referred to in the local government act (or planning act) of your
> particular state.
No idea, I've always known them to be called
My argument is that a "tax purpose" is not a land use - you can run a small
business (tax purpose) from a residential address but it doesn't make it a
commercial property.
On 17 June 2010 11:42, John Smith wrote:
> On 17 June 2010 11:40, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> > are we mapping for tax purpos
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:07 AM, John Smith wrote:
> On 17 June 2010 10:39, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
>> I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
>> landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
>
> Aren't they commonly known as hobb
I don't disagree Roy.
I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to) distinguish
between types of landuse?
On 17 June 2010 13:54, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Jun
On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> I don't disagree Roy.
> I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
> peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
>
> The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to) distinguish
> between types of landuse?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith wrote:
> On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
>> I don't disagree Roy.
>> I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
>> peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
>>
>> The other alternative is another tag to help (
+1
nothing is ever perfect in everyones eyes, but I can live with it :)
On 17 June 2010 15:19, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith
> wrote:
> > On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt
> wrote:
> >> I don't disagree Roy.
> >> I still argue that the land use isn't wh
010 12:07
To: Craig Feuerherdt
Cc: talk-au
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Residential landuse
On 17 June 2010 10:39, Craig Feuerherdt wrote:
> I am facing the same issue in Bendigo. I have been considering suggesting a
> landuse=rural_residential tag. AS you state, these blocks are too small for
15 matches
Mail list logo
