Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread Liz
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, John Smith wrote: I have seen a lot of effulent dump points for caravans that are on their own, the other types of waste are usually handled by a recycling centre, and tagging what types of waste those centres will handle is probably useful as well:

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread Darrin Smith
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:32:42 +1100 Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: I believe its actually dumped into the town sewerage system which in the Murrumbidgee means it is all going to be recycled into drinking water for Adelaide after we've used it 10 more times. And will probably improve the quality

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread Liz
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Darrin Smith wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:32:42 +1100 Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: I believe its actually dumped into the town sewerage system which in the Murrumbidgee means it is all going to be recycled into drinking water for Adelaide after we've used it 10 more

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread John Smith
On 17 February 2010 18:32, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: come on guys - suggestions for Mens Shed required too amenity=mens_shed operator=Rotary ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread Nick Hocking
* And will probably improve the quality of the water here anyway ;) ** *the main problem is that we get Canberra's p*** in the water first before we even get it Oh, ohh, I think I see where this one is going... Now the Canberra mappers are going to get all defensive and blame the upstream

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-17 Thread Liz
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Nick Hocking wrote: Actually, it is interesting to see (via the river reports) where all the recent flood waters are being secreted away and how much is actually getting to S.Aus. A couple more cyclones and maybe Lake Alexandrina maybe get refilled. so, let's whinge

[talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread Liz
anyone decided how to tag a grey water or effluent dump? or a Men's Shed? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread John Smith
On 16 February 2010 20:04, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: anyone decided how to tag a grey water or effluent dump? amenity=waste_disposal ? ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread David Murn
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 21:41 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, John Smith wrote: On 16 February 2010 20:04, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: anyone decided how to tag a grey water or effluent dump? amenity=waste_disposal ? not clear that it is effluent being disposed of

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread Andrew Laughton
IMHO tourism=effluent_dump is good, as they are aimed at tourists, but it is not an attraction as such. recycling:excrement=yes not really relevant it is not really recycling. or even amenity=waste_disposal waste=excrement Not bad, but the second tag is useless by itself, it would be better if it

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread David Murn
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 02:36 +0800, Andrew Laughton wrote: recycling:excrement=yes not really relevant it is not really recycling. Why not? Unless you put the waste into a sealed container and bury it in the ground, almost all effluent is partially recycled, eg sewage/septic systems.

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread John Smith
On 17 February 2010 10:31, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: Why not? Unless you put the waste into a sealed container and bury it in the ground, almost all effluent is partially recycled, eg sewage/septic systems. It might be treated/broken down by enzymes and the water might be put

Re: [talk-au] answers to the difficult questions

2010-02-16 Thread John Smith
On 17 February 2010 17:19, Andrew Laughton laughton.and...@gmail.com wrote: The point being if someone wanted to search for the nearest effluent dump, it would be much easier to search for a single tag, not multiple tags. Which relies on the assumption of no pre-processing. You can potentially