Re: [talk-au] relations

2012-07-25 Thread Adrian Plaskitt
Thanks, fellas, I had worried that splitting ways would cause trouble with route finding etc as one street would become 2 adjoining streets with the same name. Regards, adrian > From: talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Talk-au Digest, Vol 61, Issue 34 > To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [talk-au] Relations, road names and numbers

2010-01-04 Thread John Smith
2010/1/5 Roy Wallace : > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: >> >> ... I think it would probably be a >> good thing if renderers distinguished as little as possible between >> properties on ways and properties on relations. > > +1. Tagging the way should override the tag on the r

Re: [talk-au] Relations, road names and numbers

2010-01-04 Thread Roy Wallace
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > > ... I think it would probably be a > good thing if renderers distinguished as little as possible between > properties on ways and properties on relations. +1. Tagging the way should override the tag on the relation, where applicable (which

Re: [talk-au] Relations, road names and numbers

2010-01-04 Thread James Livingston
On 04/01/2010, at 5:19 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: > The question is, should we move "highway=" onto the relation for all > relations? There's probably a fix for Mapnik to save editing every > relation we've done, so I've added a ticket to OSM. > http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2599 I wouldn't

Re: [talk-au] Relations, road names and numbers

2010-01-04 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Mark Pulley wrote: > > The question is, should we move "highway=" onto the relation for all > relations? There's probably a fix for Mapnik to save editing every > relation we've done, so I've added a ticket to OSM. > http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2599 > Wit

Re: [talk-au] Relations, road names and numbers

2010-01-03 Thread Mark Pulley
Quoting myself : > Incidentally, I've noticed that the route numbers and route names > aren't showing in Mapnik for relations. As an experiment, I added a > stub for C528 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/374047 ) > using someone else's trace and my voice recording of the route number.

Re: [talk-au] Relations

2008-09-09 Thread Liz
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Nick Hocking wrote: > Sorry 'bout the formatting (looked ok on my screen). > > It doesnt make much sense now - damm. I'll try anyway. there's a No Left Turn in the metropolis of Binalong - important for routing because it keeps traffic on the main road. __

[talk-au] Relations

2008-09-09 Thread Nick Hocking
Sorry 'bout the formatting (looked ok on my screen). It doesnt make much sense now - damm. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Relations

2008-09-09 Thread Nick Hocking
Hi Liz, OK - the JOSM relation editor is still a bit "beta-ish" so you have to type all the info. Here's an example No right turn from a-street to b-road key value --- : type restriction