&source=sd
Cheers - Phil
From: Nathanael Coyne
Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2020 9:56 AM
To: adam steer
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] tagging burnt areas
It'd be like trying to tag plots in landuse=forest as felled or mature. While
it'd be interesting it
It'd be like trying to tag plots in landuse=forest as felled or mature.
While it'd be interesting it would quickly become unreliable and reduce the
quality of data.
So while I would love to have burnt areas mapped in OSM I just think it's
not worth trying.
Nathanael Coyne
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at
I’d personally avoid tagging areas as burnt - they’re temporary and as per
advice from Andrew maybe should be left tagged as their long term state.
Looking around where I am (Benambra and north) there are already a lot of
overlapping/duplicated/whats this for polygons relating to land cover… it’d
On 27/1/20 11:13 pm, Ewen Hill wrote:
I would only be replacing any known houses and outbuildings with
buildling=ruins. There are a number of old bridges that fall probably
under this category along railtrails etc.
I don't think much of the tag building=ruins. A church in ruins is still
rec
I would only be replacing any known houses and outbuildings with
buildling=ruins. There are a number of old bridges that fall probably under
this category along railtrails etc. however the bush and grasslands will
regrow ... unless it happens to reburn again this season.
In Victoria over 1000 b
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:51 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
> I have thought about if we should map burnt areas, it's tricky because
> while it is surveyable, it changes quickly and the point at when it changes
> to no longer burnt is subjective. For those reasons I do think it's better
> to store thi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=brownfield is absolutely
not correct, have you reverted? Which changesets?
They are still wood even if burnt so natural=wood should apply.
I have thought about if we should map burnt areas, it's tricky because
while it is surveyable, it changes quic
Hi,
A German mapper in Carbargo has used landuse=brownfield to map burnt areas.
One such area is a recreation ground... so it would be burnt grass.
Is it a good idea to map such things?
It could be said this is 'temporary' so not something OSM should map.
If so, how should it be tagged?
I
8 matches
Mail list logo
